Category Archives: Crop Update

Herbicide-resistant Italian Ryegrass

With harvest in full swing, it is hard not to forget about weed control in wheat.  Primarily of concern is herbicide-resistant Italian ryegrass.  In the past, ACCase- (Hoelon) and ALS-inhibiting (PowerFlex and Osprey) herbicides provided control of this weed.  However, Italian ryegrass biotypes resistant to these products have developed, but that is not to say these herbicides will no longer work in your area.  For example, Osprey is still effective throughout most of Eastern North Carolina, but once you move into the Piedmont, ryegrass control by Osprey is hit or miss.  In areas with known ALS-resistant Italian ryegrass, Zidua is suggested delayed-preemergence.  Delayed-preemergence means 80% of germinated wheat seeds have a shoot at least ½-inch long.  If applied prior to this stage, injury may occur.  Zidua is a seedling-shoot inhibitor and will not control emerged weeds, therefore, it is important for fields to be clean prior to application.  Axiom applied spike (applied preemergence, Axiom can cause severe injury) also controls Italian ryegrass if a timely activating rainfall is received following application.  Another option on no-till or minimum-till fields (where stubble from previous crop has not been incorporated) is Valor SX applied preplant.  Valor must be applied at least 7 days prior to wheat planting and should be applied in combination with either paraquat or glyphosate to control emerged weeds.  Tillage should not be performed after Valor SX is applied.  Italian ryegrass control by Finesse is variable and growers should expect only suppression.  If Finesse is applied, plant only STS-soybean following wheat harvest.  Postemergence options for Italian ryegrass include Axial XL and Osprey.   Although most Italian ryegrass is Hoelon-resistant, Axial XL (also an ACCase-inhibiting herbicide) still seems to work in most areas.  Osprey may also control Italian ryegrass in areas yet to develop resistance and will also control small bluegrass.

Ryegrass in the non-treated control.

Ryegrass in the non-treated control.  Received glyphosate 14 days preplant.

Ryegrass control by Valor SX plus glyphosate applied 7 days preplant

Ryegrass control by Valor SX plus glyphosate applied 7 days preplant

 

 

Virginia Frost Advisory

The Virginia Frost Advisory predicts that a frost is expected next Monday morning (10/19) for Suffolk, Capron, Waverly, Skippers, and Lewiston.  A copy of the report can be downloaded below. For up-to-date frost advisories for the region, see the Peanut-Cotton Infonet (http://webipm.ento.vt.edu/cgi-bin/listfrost).

Frost Advisory 10-12-2015

Wheat seeding rate and drill calibration, 2015-16

Based on previous research we know we need at least 70-80 heads per square foot to reach optimum wheat yields. That typically requires a seeding rate of 30-35 seeds per square foot, which is equivalent to 20-22 seeds per foot of row in 7.5 inch rows. The reason we advise seeding based on actual number of seeds per seed lot, and not on a pound per acre basis is that seed size varies considerably among wheat varieties and over years for the same variety. The number of seeds per pound is determined both by genetics and by environment. A few of the entries in our state wheat variety test are listed below and it’s obvious that a range of 30% or larger exists among varieties within a year. The consequence of not calibrating grain drills to deliver the optimum seeding rate can vary. If too little seed is planted, yield potential may be compromised. Overseeding increases seeding cost and in a year with smaller profit margins in wheat, we certainly need to avoid both. This management activity is an investment of time, but spending that time can result in greater profit.

 

2016

2015

2014

Mean

% Dev.

———–seed/lb———–

Massey

13046

12371

10318

11912

23%

Jamestown

13472

14277

11762

13170

19%

Shirley

11100

10861

9722

10561

13%

Pioneer Brand 26R20

12825

14157

11378

12787

22%

Pioneer Brand 25R32

13593

13488

13353

13478

2%

Featherstone 73

14099

12304

11436

12613

21%

VA10W-119

10993

11756

9578

10775

20%

Pioneer Brand 26R10

10509

12587

11073

11390

18%

Pioneer Brand 26R41

11979

10682

10913

11192

12%

Pioneer Brand 26R53

11671

11988

11947

11869

3%

Avg. by year 12329 12447 11148 11975

 

 

Soybean disease update – frogeye leaf spot

I have received numerous reports of soybean fields with moderate to severe frogeye leaf spot (FLS) over the past several weeks. In most cases, the disease is showing up in fields planted to a FLS susceptible variety and/or in fields that have been in continuous soybean. FLS can cause significant yield loss in susceptible varieties, so fungicides may be needed to control the disease in high risk fields (see accompanying blog post “Foliar fungicide applications in soybean”). Unfortunately, FLS isolates resistant to strobilurin (QoI, Group 11) fungicides have been confirmed from some locations in Virginia, so fungicide control failures can occur if the proper fungicide chemistries are not selected as illustrated in the pictures below. A soybean fungicide efficacy table with ratings based on data from multiple field trials in multiple states can be downloaded below. We are currently surveying fields in Virginia for strobilurin-resistant FLS and will have data on the frequency and distribution of resistance later this year. In the meantime, it should be assumed that FLS will not be controlled by strobilurin fungicides, and other fungicide chemistries (e.g. triazoles) should be applied in fields with FLS either alone or in combination with a strobilurin. Keep in mind that strobilurin fungicides still provide good control of other diseases that can occur in soybean.

FLS - untreated

FLS – untreated

FLS - 2 fungicide applications

FLS – 2 fungicide applications

Soybean disease scouting & fungicide guide 2015

Foliar fungicide applications in soybean

If and when to make a foliar fungicide application is a decision soybean producers must make each growing season. Every year is slightly different, and it is difficult to predict whether or not a fungicide application will be profitable. However, the risk factors listed below can be used to make an educated decision of whether or not to spray. The greater the number of risk factors in your field, the more likely it is that a fungicide application will be profitable.

  1. Growth stage of the crop. Disease is most likely to impact yield during pod and seed development since this is when the yield of the crop is being formed. Fungicides are more likely to result in a yield response if disease occurs between the beginning pod (R3) and full seed (R6) growth stages, a period that lasts approximately 30 days. Results from research conducted in 2014 suggest that a fungicide application is most likely to result in a yield response if weather conditions (see #2 below) conducive for disease development occur within two weeks of the R3/R4 growth stage. Overall, the optimum timing for a fungicide is at the R3/R4 growth stage, though later applications can be beneficial if diseases develop later in the season. Fungicide applications after the R5 growth stage are not recommended.
  2. Weather conditions. Currently, research is being conducted to develop a weather-based fungicide decision aid for soybean. Infection, growth, and sporulation by foliar pathogens occurs when temperatures are moderately warm and during periods of rainfall or high humidity. To determine the relative disease risk based on weather conditions, find a source of hourly temperature, rainfall, and relative humidity data (e.g. Weather Underground or a personal weather station). If over the past week the following conditions occurred on two or more days, the risk of disease development in the crop is high:
    • Average daily temperatures from 65-80 °F AND
    • 10 or more hours of relative humidity at or above 95% OR a rainfall event
    These conditions have occurred in many areas throughout Virginia over the past week as storms have moved through. However, before making a fungicide application consider the other risk factors below.
  3. Susceptibility of soybean variety to disease. Soybean varieties vary in their susceptibility to diseases, and more susceptible varieties are more likely to need a fungicide to protect yield. Keep in mind that a variety may be relatively resistant/tolerant to one or a few diseases but susceptible to others, so be aware of which diseases are most likely to occur in your field (see #4 and #5 below).
  4. Field history. Soybean debris is a source of pathogen inoculum, so diseases will show up earlier and be more severe in fields planted to soybean year after year compared to those in rotation with corn or another crop. History of a particular disease in a field should also be considered since it is likely to occur year after year.
  5. Confirmation of disease in a field. If you see a foliar disease starting to develop in your soybean crop, it may be a sign that it is time to apply a fungicide. Scouting may be useful for some diseases such as frogeye leaf spot, but other diseases (e.g. Cercospora blight) do not show symptoms until long after infections have occurred. Fungicides are more effective when applied preventatively, but applications shortly after the onset of symptoms will slow the progress of the disease. Thresholds have not been established for frogeye leaf spot or other foliar diseases of soybean.
  6. Yield potential. This year some soybean fields got off to a poor start and never really recovered. If growth is poor and yield potential is low, you do not have much yield to protect and fungicide applications are less likely to be profitable. In contrast, if a crop has high yield potential, a fungicide application can help to maximize that yield, especially if the variety is susceptible to disease.

TriCor Receives Registration for use in Wheat and Barley

The herbicide TriCor, a metribuzin product from United Phosphorus Inc., has received 24(c) registration (special local needs) for use in Virginia for control of Harmony and Harmony Extra (group 2 herbicides) resistant common chickweed. The supplemental label is here: TriCor DF Herbicide 24(c) VA label. This is good news for small grains growers.

Research by Drs. Scott Hagood and Michael Flessner indicate that TriCor at 2 oz/a results in excellent common chickweed control when applied in fall or spring, with no significant injury to wheat. However, wheat injury can be a concern. Using crop oil concentrate or vegetable oil surfactants with TriCor increases the risk of crop injury, as well as when applying with fertilizer in combination with TriCor. Growers should select wheat and barley varieties that are tolerant of metribuzin if planning on using TriCor as certain varieties are more sensitive to metribuzin than others. Seed dealers may have information regarding metribuzin tolerance. Additionally, preliminary nonreplicated wheat variety sensitivity research by Drs. Wade Thomason, Carl Griffey, and Michael Flessner is included in this publication: https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/CSES/CSES-129/CSES-129-PDF.pdf. See pages 99 to 101.

Always make sure to read and follow the product label. Also note that TriCor is the only stand-alone metribuzin product legal for this use.

Example of wheat variety differences in sensitivity

Example of wheat variety differences in sensitivity to metribuzin. Thomason 2015.

Corn disease update — July 28, 2015

In an update to my previous post, southern corn rust has now been confirmed in Chesapeake, VA. This is a few days earlier than in 2014 (August 3), but most of the field corn in the region is mature enough (dent stage) that yield should not be impacted. Late planted corn in fields with good yield potential (120 bu/ac +) may need to be protected with a foliar fungicide. Strobilurins are good preventative fungicides whereas triazoles are recommended once sporulation is observed in a field due to their curative activity. A combination fungicide is a good option as long as a strobilurin fungicide has not been applied previously. Wet, warm weather favors disease development. Once sporulation occurs, symptoms of rust are relatively obvious. Lesions start out as raised, blister-like pustules then break open to reveal orange spores. Samples of corn plants with symptoms of southern rust can be submitted to the disease clinic at the Virginia Tech Tidewater AREC (contact Dr. Hillary Mehl, hlmehl@vt.edu).

Corn disease update – July 26, 2015

Much of the field corn in the region is near or at the dent stage and no longer at risk for yield loss from foliar diseases. One disease I frequently receive questions about is southern corn rust. Southern corn rust is a potentially aggressive disease, but the fungus does not overwinter in Virginia and it is typically seen late in the growing season if at all. In 2014, southern corn rust was confirmed in Virginia on August 3, which is relatively early compared to other years. As of this week, southern corn rust has been confirmed from four North Carolina counties (Hyde, Lenior, Beaufort, and Camden) but it has not been observed in Virginia. We very well may see southern corn rust in southeastern Virginia within the next couple of weeks, but there is no need to panic. Yield of corn at or near the dent stage is unlikely to be impacted by the disease, but late planted corn in fields with good yield potential (120 bu/ac +) may need to be protected with a foliar fungicide. Strobilurins are good preventative fungicides whereas triazoles are recommended once sporulation is observed in a field due to their curative activity. A combination fungicide is a good option as long as a strobilurin fungicide has not been applied previously. Wet, warm weather favors disease development. Once sporulation occurs, symptoms of rust are relatively obvious. Lesions start out as raised, blister-like pustules then break open to reveal orange spores. Samples of corn plants with symptoms of southern rust can be submitted to the disease clinic at the Virginia Tech Tidewater AREC (contact Dr. Hillary Mehl, hlmehl@vt.edu).

Southern corn rust

Southern corn rust

Virginia Peanut-Cotton Infonet Update

The Virginia Tech Tidewater AREC (TAREC) maintains the Peanut-Cotton Infonet website (webipm.ento.vt.edu/infonet/) which provides growers in southeast Virginia with daily weather data (e.g. air and soil temperatures, rainfall, relative humidity), peanut leaf spot and Sclerotinia advisories, peanut heat units, cotton degree days, and a frost advisory. Four weather stations located in Suffolk, Capron, Skippers, and Waverly are maintained by the TAREC Plant Pathology program. Thanks to funding from the Virginia Peanut and Cotton Boards, we have been able to upgrade our equipment which should improve the overall reliability and consistency of data transfer from our weather stations. The new equipment has been installed and we are receiving data, but we are temporarily unable to post the data to the Infonet website. This technical issue should be resolved by next week, but in the meantime daily weather data will be sent out as an email to extension agents and posted to the Virginia Ag Pest Advisory Blog. We apologize for the inconvenience, and we are working hard to get the Peanut-Cotton Infonet website up and running for the season. If you have any questions or concerns feel free to call the TAREC Plant Pathology lab at (757) 657-6450 ext. 428 or email Dr. Hillary Mehl (hlmehl@vt.edu).

Please find below the current weather data for Suffolk, Capron, and Skippers. The Waverly data will be available shortly.

SE VA Weather Data 5-1-15