Annual End of August Apple Maturity Report

For 26 years, researchers at the Alson H. Smith, Jr. AREC have recorded Golden Delicious and Red Delicious apple maturity data from orchards based in and around Winchester. Data for Empire has been taken for ten years and for Gala for five years. In recent years, we have added other commercially important cultivars to the analyses in order to generate long term averages. These data provide an interesting insight into the current season’s harvest, and can help growers make decisions on when to pick different blocks.

Earlier this season, I discussed the potential for a very early harvest. Based on a model developed at Michigan State University, the first Red Delicious harvest was estimated to be August 27 in Winchester and August 25  in Central Virginia (see post from June 28). While extraordinarily early, this prediction may be fairly accurate. Red Delicious Brix are already at 11.9 (two brix units greater than the long-term average) and firmness is down to 18.2. I have already heard of Reds being picked in Central Virginia, but not yet in the Winchester area.

Another one of my concerns with this early season was the potential for there to be poor color development. This has not come to fruition, and in fact, on Red Delicious, Gala, and Empire red color is the highest it has ever been at this time of year. The cool nights predicted for the next 10 days, should further enhance color development.

Below are the data from this year’s end of August apple maturity sampling. In each year, the samples were taken around August 25 and consist of apples from the AREC and a few local growers. Thanks to Dave Carbaugh, Mark Sutphin, Rachel Marple, and Nick Leaverton for helping to collect and process the fruit. Please refer to my post from yesterday if you need help interpreting the different maturity indices. You can also download a pdf  of this data.

Golden Delicious Maturity Report 1986-2012

 

 
Year

Background Color (1-4)*

Firmness (lbs)

Soluble Solids (ºBrix)

Starch-iodine Index

(1-8)**

Ethylene (ppm)

Bloom Date

1986

2.2

19.5

12.7

1987

20.0

12.2

1988

18.6

11.0

1.5

1989

17.7

10.3

2.0

1990

18.0

10.5

1.6

1991

1.8

19.7

12.0

2.1

1992

1.8

20.1

12.0

1.6

1993

1.9

19.8

11.6

1.5

1994

2.3

19.8

12.0

1.7

1995

0.9

18.8

10.9

2.1

1996

2.9

19.6

11.2

2.9

1997

2.0

21.8

11.7

2.0

1998

2.5

19.2

12.2

2.1

1999

1.9

20.3

11.7

1.4

2000

1.8

17.5

11.9

2.5

2001

1.9

20.1

11.0

1.4

2002

2.2

21.2

11.4

2.1

2003

2.6

20.3

11.1

1.2

2004

2.3

18.2

12.3

2.0

2005

1.8

20.1

11.4

1.7

2006

1.9

18.5

12.4

1.8

2007

1.6

18.0

12.3

1.6

2008

2.1

18.3

12.9

1.6

22-23 Apr

2009

1.8

17.2

12.4

1.7

22-Apr

2010

1.6

18.6

12.9

1.4

13-Apr

2011

2.1

20.1

12.9

1.2

20-Apr

2012

2.5

18.5

12.5

1.3

0.00

2-Apr

Mean

2.0

19.2

11.8

1.8

16-Apr

Max

2.9

21.8

12.9

2.9

23-Apr

Min

0.9

17.2

10.3

1.2

2-Apr

* 1 = green, 2 = light green, 3 = yellowish green, 4 = yellow.
** 1 = 100% starch, 5 = 60% starch, 8 = 0% starch.

 


 


 

Red Delicious Maturity Report 1986-2012

Year

Red Color (%)

Firmness (lbs)

Soluble Solids (ºBrix)

Starch-iodine Index

(1-8)*

Ethylene (ppm)

Bloom Date

1986

72.0

18.8

11.2

1987

68.0

19.8

10.8

1988

54.0

18.4

10.0

1.6

1989

69.0

18.6

8.7

1.6

1990

73.0

18.1

8.9

1.5

1991

69.0

18.8

10.4

1.6

1992

76.0

20.8

10.2

1.3

1993

68.0

21.7

9.5

1.7

1994

68.0

19.7

9.5

1.9

1995

68.0

19.2

9.1

1.6

1996

62.5

19.3

8.9

2.0

25-Apr

1997

66.7

22.4

9.4

1.2

25-Apr

1998

81.9

19.3

9.9

2.5

15-Apr

1999

65.5

19.8

10.5

1.9

28-Apr

2000

87.4

16.2

9.6

2.3

11-Apr

2001

61.0

20.5

8.3

1.8

28-Apr

2002

60.2

21.4

9.4

2.1

22-Apr

2003

58.4

20.4

8.5

1.9

22-Apr

2004

88.2

16.7

10.0

2.3

20-Apr

2005

73.7

18.7

9.2

2.0

24-Apr

2006

63.8

18.7

10.7

2.0

16-Apr

2007

81.1

18.1

11.0

1.7

22-Apr

2008

86.6

18.1

9.4

2.0

22-Apr

2009

79.2

17.5

10.2

1.9

24-Apr

2010

65.9

18.2

11.5

1.7

8-Apr

2011

67.5

19.8

11.5

2.1

21-Apr

2012

92.5

18.2

11.9

1.8

0.03

29-30-Mar

Mean

71.4

19.2

9.9

1.8

19-Apr

Max

92.5

22.4

11.9

2.5

28-Apr

Min

54.0

16.2

8.3

1.2

29-30-Mar

* 1 = 100% starch, 5 = 60% starch, 8 = 0% starch.


 

Gala Maturity Report 2008-2012

 

 
Year

Red Color (%)

Firmness (lbs)

Soluble Solids (ºBrix)

Starch-iodine Index

(1-8)*

Ethylene (ppm)

Bloom Date

2008

93.5

18.3

13.6

5.6

21-Apr

2009

86.8

17.5

13.4

4.5

22-Apr

2010

78.0

16.3

14.9

6.4

9-Apr

2011

77.5

19.4

13.7

4.9

19-Apr

2012

91.1

18.0

13.2

4.1

7.13

29-30-Mar

Mean

85.4

17.9

13.8

5.1

14-Apr

Max

93.5

19.4

14.9

6.4

22-Apr

Min

77.5

16.3

13.2

4.1

29-30-Mar

* 1 = 100% starch, 5 = 60% starch, 8 = 0% starch.

 

Empire Maturity Report 2002-2012

 

 
Year

Red Color (%)

Firmness (lbs)

Soluble Solids (ºBrix)

Starch-iodine Index

(1-8)*

Ethylene (ppm)

Bloom Date

2002

42.0

25.3

10.4

2.1

2003

60.4

21.9

9.6

1.7

2004

78.1

17.2

10.9

2.2

2005

55.3

20.3

10.1

1.9

2006

46.0

19.7

10.7

2.1

2007

64.0

17.9

10.6

2.1

2008

66.3

18.2

11.0

2.1

21-Apr

2009

52.4

16.6

10.9

1.1

20-Apr

2010

44.3

18.1

10.7

1.8

2011

49.8

19.7

11.2

2.0

2012

85.9

19.2

12.5

1.7

0.01

29-Mar

Mean

58.6

19.5

10.8

1.9

13-Apr

Max

85.9

25.3

12.5

2.2

21-Apr

Min

42.0

16.6

9.6

1.1

29-Mar

* 1 = 100% starch, 5 = 60% starch, 8 = 0% starch.

 

Maturity Report – Other Varieties 2012

 

 
Variety

Red Color (%)

Firmness (lbs)

Soluble Solids (ºBrix)

Starch-iodine Index

(1-8)*

Ethylene (ppm)

Bloom Date

Fuji Early Strain

65.5

16.7

14.65

4.1

0.03

5-Apr

Fuji Late Strain

30.0

20.9

12.1

2.1

0.03

5-Apr

Ida Red

36.7

17.0

12.3

1.3

0.00

2-Apr

Rome

39.8

22.5

12.3

1.5

.

12-Apr

York

41.8

22.4

10.7

1

0.00

3-Apr

* 1 = 100% starch, 5 = 60% starch, 8 = 0% starch.

Harvest Maturity Resources

As we work our way through the 2012 harvest season, I’ve had several questions about maturity testing. Maturity testing helps growers plan their harvest scheduling to ensure optimal prices from buyers and, if desired, allow for the longest-term storability.

Here is a quick review of some of the different maturity indices that can be used for apples.

Starch-iodine test: As apples ripen, starch is converted to sugars. In the starch test, iodine binds with starch granules in the fruit and develops into a dark purple to almost black color. The less iodine development (less dark purple color) that you see, the more ripe the apple. Several visual rating scales have been developed to assist with understanding how to rate the various degrees of starch development. A commonly used starch index in the Eastern US was developed by Blanpied and Silsby and can be downloaded for free here: Predicting Harvest Date Windows for Apples. The color chart is located in the centerfold and is often referred to as the Cornell Starch-Iodine Chart (you can also download the below jpg file). Variety specific charts can be found through Google searches on the internet.

Pre-mixed iodine solution can be purchased through Wilson Irrigation in Yakima, WA. However, you can also make your own starch solution following either of the two recipes below:

Recipe 1: Purchase a 2% alcoholic solution of medicinal iodine from your local drug store and mix with an equal amount of water. (Purchasing the iodine at a drug store will be costly if you are going to need a lot of iodine solution during the harvest season.)

Recipe 2: Add 10 grams of potassium iodide and 2.5 grams of iodine crystals to 1 liter of distilled water. The solution may need to sit overnight before the iodine is fully dissolved. The reagents can be purchased through chemical suppliers such as Sigma-Aldrich or Fischer Scientific.

Store the iodine solution in an opaque container, or wrap the container with aluminum foil to prevent direct sunlight exposure. Sunlight will cause the iodine color to fade over time.

Growers and field managers who are visiting numerous orchards throughout the day often fill spray bottles with the iodine solution to conduct tests in the field. A 10-apple sample from a uniform block will usually suffice as long as proper sampling is conducted. Make sure to pick the samples from trees with an average crop load for that block and at a similar location on each tree to reduce within- and between-tree variability. The apples should be cut through the equator since apples do not ripen uniformly from stem- to calyx-end.

Soluble solid content: Soluble solids are measured in the unit •Brix and are a fairly close approximation for the total sugar content. You can find both handheld digital and optical refractometers through several sources, including QA Supply in Norfolk, VA and Wilson Irrigation in Yakima, WA.

Ethylene: In my lab, we use the internal ethylene method where a hypodermic needle is inserted through the calyx into the core cavity of an apple and a 1 cc gas sample is removed. This sample is analyzed by using a gas chromatograph (GC) that has been calibrated with known ethylene standards. As a rule of thumb, when apples are above about 1 ppm they are considered to have started the autocatalytic process known as climacteric ripening. Once apples begin this ripening process, they will increase many of the desirable eating characteristics (increased flavors, aromas, and sugars, and decreased firmness), but they will also begin to decrease in their capacity to maintain quality during long-term storage. Refrigeration, controlled atmosphere storage, AVG (ReTain), and 1-MCP (SmartFresh) will help to minimize additional ripening during storage. However, once the climacteric ripening process begins, it can not be reversed.

Firmness: Apples can be tested for firmness using a penetrometer. You can find handheld and bench-top instruments through several sources, including QA Supply in Norfolk, VA and Wilson Irrigation in Yakima, WA. While not an exact measure of maturity, firmness does decrease during the ripening process and is a very important apple quality parameter.

Size: For processing fruit, fruit size is often used to as a standard for quality. Many processors desire fruit to be a minimum of 2.75 inches, although market demands may influence that size standard. Sizes will also determine the packout and ultimately the value of the apples using USDA grading standards.

Red and background color: Many varieties have market standards for the percent of red surface or background green to yellow color needed to meet USDA grading standards. In general, cool nights will aid the development of color. Poor coloring strains of Red Delicious, Gala, and Fuji apples may need to be left on the tree for longer than their high coloring counterparts.

Flavor: Although we can use sophisticated instruments to quantify the concentration of individual flavor molecules in apples, the best measure is probably the human mouth. Always sample a few bites of your apples before picking to make sure they have the desired varietal characteristics. Picking good tasting fruit is important for all operations, but for those with direct marketing businesses, flavor might be the most important characteristic for determining harvest maturity.

As always, check with your buyer before picking so that you can ensure that you deliver to your customers the apples that will receive highest return.

I will share harvest maturity information for many of the commercially important apple cultivars found in the Winchester area at tonight’s Commercial Fruit Twilight Meeting and on this blog in a few days.

References

Blanpied, G.D. and K.J. Silsby. 1992. Predicting Harvest Date Windows for Apples. A Cornell Cooperative Extension Publication. Info. Bull. 221.

Anon. 1986. Apple Maturity Program Handbook. Washington State Apple Maturity Program. Wenatchee, WA.

Compensation for Storm Related Crop and Tree Loss

Compensation for Storm Related Crop and Tree Loss
From: Michael Lachance, July 6, 2012

Last week, <Michael> made an inquiry to the USDA Farm Service center about storm recovery capability.  Brent Whitlock from the Farm Service Agency in Richmond reported that those producers without crop insurance may be out of luck, as it is a requirement for receiving benefits from the Supplemental Revenue Assistance Payments (SURE) Program, for losses from this year’s orchard production.

http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=diap&topic=sure

Similarly, people without crop insurance cannot access Tree Assistance Program (TAP) (1-TAP-31 C Rev. 3) to replace destroyed trees.

http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=diap&topic=tap

To be eligible for either SURE or TAP, orchard owners would have had to be signed on by September 30, 2011.

For growers with crop insurance, they will need to contact their agent.

Currently, TAP is gone as of October 1, 2011. However, it is in their best interest to document their tree losses with pictures and by someone who can testify to the loss, such as an arborist (like the veterinarian provision in LIP) just in case some new form of TAP comes out of the 2012 Farm Bill. This action should be done before they destroy the existing stand of apple trees.

Michael Lachance
VCE-Agriculture and Natural Resources
Nelson County Unit
8445 Thomas Nelson Highway
Lovingston, VA  22949
434 263 4035
FAX 434 263 4367
Lachance@vt.edu

Predicting harvest dates

With bloom being three to four weeks earlier than average this year, most tree-fruit crops are also being harvested earlier than usual. In a cherry trial that I have at the AREC, what few fruit survived the March 27 frost were harvested about three weeks ahead of last year. Likewise, we are picking peaches two to three weeks ahead of last year.

In our apple blocks, we are already seeing large fruit sizes for this time of year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For apples, there are several prediction models that are used to estimate harvest dates. I used a model from Michigan State University that was published in HortTech by Randy Beaudry et al. (1993) to predict harvest maturity for apples.

The model predicts the first Red Delicious pick for Controlled Atmosphere (CA) storage, assuming that:

  • For this pick the desired starch is between 2.5-4 and the firmness is between 17-18 pounds.
  • There are 143 days between 80% full bloom and the first CA harvest
  • Deviations from 143 days are based upon the minimum temperatures for the 15 days after 80% full bloom. For each degree Fahrenheit change from 50F there is a 1 day plus or minus change in the harvest date.
  • For Winchester, using March 29 as the 80% full bloom date, the model is predicting August 27 as the date for the first CA harvest.
  • For Batesville, using March 29 as the 80% full bloom date, the model is predicting August 25 as the date for the first CA harvest.

(As a side note, it is interesting that both Winchester and central VA called March 29 the full bloom date. I choose the date for Winchester, and a grower choose the date for central VA.)

While the model isn’t perfect, when I ran data from 2011 and looked at harvest maturity indices, it was remarkably close. The model predicted Sept 10 as the harvest date; on Sept 12, Reds were at starch = 4.2 (8-pt scale), Brix = 13, and firmness = 17.9 lbs.

Since most growers have at least a few Reds, harvest dates for other varieties can be approximated. Otherwise, a rule of thumb is “for each 2-3 days departure for the normal bloom date, there will be a one-day departure from the normal harvest date.” Blanpied and Silsby (1992).

While there might be other factors that affect these predicted dates, especially given the oddities of this year, growers should be advised about the potential for such an early harvest. Some things to consider with an early harvest: the availability of labor when the fruit is ready to be picked, PHI, seasonal maximum rates for pesticides, and when to start applying stop-drop materials. I’ll talk more about stop-drop strategies when we meet at Cline’s Orchard and Graves Mountain Lodge in July.

Please let me know if any questions arise about this model or the predicted dates. Or, for that matter, horticultural questions in general.

Best regards,

Greg

References

Beaudry, R., P. Schwallier, and M. Lennington. 1993. Apple Maturity Prediction: An Extension Tool to Aid Fruit Storage Decisions. HortTechnology 3(2): 233-239.

Blanpied, G.D. and K.J. Silsby. 1992. Predicting Harvest Date Windows for Apples. Information Bulletin 221: A Cornell Cooperative Extension Publication, Ithaca, NY.

July 12, 2012 Twilight Meeting at Cline’s Farm

The attached information on the Commercial Fruit Twilight Meeting Notice July 12, 2012 is being sent to you on behalf of Mark Sutphin, Associate Extension Agent, Agriculture and Natural Resources-Horticulture.  Mark serves the counties of Clarke, Frederick, Page, Shenandoah, and Warren.  He can be reached at the Frederick County Office at 540/665-5699 or via email mark.sutphin@vt.edu.

Please note that registration is required to participate in the catered meal.  We will need a head count by noon on Monday, July 9th.

Upcoming Meeting — Rappahannock County

A reminder that we will be meeting at Sunnyside Organic Orchard tomorrow, May 23 at 11AM. This is one of the in-orchard meetings organized by Kenner Love, VCE Rappahannock County. I’ve had several requests for information about organic apple production recently, so I will use this meeting to discuss some of the basics of organic orchard management.

Please contact Kenner (klove@vt.edu) with questions about this meeting.

Upcoming Meetings — Winchester

From Mark Sutphin, VCE:

Just a quick reminder that our next Commercial Fruit Meeting is scheduled for this Thursday, May 24th at 7:00pm.  The meeting will be held at the Alson H. Smith AREC at 595 Laurel Grove Road, Winchester, VA.  Drs. Chris Bergh and Shimat Joseph will be presenting “All Bugs Considered”.   There will also be pathology and horticulture updates along with time for questions and discussion.

You should find a memo attached concerning two summer In-Orchard Twilight Meetings.  Please reserve the evening of Thursday, July 12th for a Twilight Meeting at Clines Farm and Thursday, August 23rd for a Twilight Meeting at Turkey Knob Growers, Inc.  Registration information will be distributed as we approach these dates.

Also a reminder that the registration deadline is June 7th  for the sprayer technology workshop scheduled for Friday June 15th.  All registration is being handled through the Virginia Vineyards Association.  Please let me know if you need another copy of the registration forms.  We have been approved to offer Category 90 full recertification accreditation for private pesticide applicators attending the sprayer technology workshop.

Feel free to contact me with any questions and I hope to see you at these events.

Mark Sutphin
Associate Extension Agent
Agriculture and Natural Resources, Horticulture
Virginia Cooperative Extension
Frederick County Office
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, VA 22601
Phone – 540.665.5699
Fax – 540.722.8380
Cell – 540.398.8148
mark.sutphin@vt.edu

2nd Announcement — Effective Spraying of Fruit Crops — June 15

This is a reminder that we will be hosting Dr. Andrew Landers from Cornell’s Pesticide Application Technology Lab on Friday, June 15 for a sprayer technology workshop. If you are interested in attending the workshop, I strongly suggest that you preregister to guarantee your space. More details and registration forms can be found in my earlier post.