Author Archives: Ames Herbert

Fall Armyworm Feeding and Small Grain Regrowth

The following comments were provided by Dr. Wade Thomason, the Virginia Tech Small Grains Specilist.

A number of fields have experienced minor to severe armyworm feeding this fall resulting in almost complete defoliation in some cases. Now the question is how much damage has been done and whether or not the small grain crop should be replanted.
The growing point for the small grains is below the soil surface at this time (and will be until spring) so the crop can tolerate defoliation without damage to the growing point. When the worm feeding ceases, these plants should begin to regrow so replanting should not be necessary. The only case that would be different would be if the worms fed on the same plants again and again, which could ultimately use up the plant root reserves. Finally the tillers we produce in the fall are very important to grain yield and how many tillers we get depends a lot on how many heat units the crop is exposed to. A clipped plant that begins to regrow tomorrow stands to benefit from better fall conditions (warmer temperatures) than a replant situation which would likely take 10 days to emerge.

Late season fall armyworm outbreak

I started getting calls and visits yesterday from homeowners and growers with complaints about ‘worm’ infestations. Fall armyworm is the culprit and apparently the problem is severe and widespread. Fall armyworms are spreading into newly planted fields of oats, rye and other fall grass forages, and into newly seeded home lawns. Calls are coming in mainly from Surry and Isle of Wight Counties, but that could be the result of the attention growers and crop advisors are paying to fields in those areas. One common denominator seems to be that most infested fields are adjacent to pasture or hay fields. Apparently, the worms have been developing in those fields and are now on-the-move into fields with tender newly emerge leaf shoots. Based on the number of reports, I suspect this problem is even more widespread. Emerging wheat and barley fields are certainly also at risk.

Fall armyworm has two ‘strains’ and I suspect this is the ‘grass strain’. I also suspect that this widespread infestation is the result of a huge migratory flight from the south—another in a long line of caterpillar invasions that started with early corn earworm problems back in July. This late season fall armyworm invasion is certainly an unusual problem. I have never seen anything like this in the 22 years I have been working in this area.

Rod Youngman on main campus (he works with insect pests of turf and forages) advised that any of the pyrethroids labeled for forages or small grains should provide good control if applied at the high rate, but should be applied NOW. He believes that seedlings are the most at risk and should be treated ASAP. Fall armyworms are surface plant feeders, so they are pretty vulnerable to pesticides. We also believe that fields grazed off by these worms should spring back once they have cycled out. Their life cycle should put them into to the pupal stage in another week or less. And of course, a good hard frost would take-em-out.

Spider mite infestations are rampant in many Virginia peanut fields

It’s September 24 and we hit 98 degrees yesterday and today here at the research station, and still no rain. A hot, dry wind is blowing across the fields and for all it’s worth, it feels like Arizona, not Virginia. Populations of spider mites which thrive in this kind of environment are exploding in peanut fields across the region. Populations are so large that they are forming pencil eraser sized balls of solid mites on the tips of the upper branches of the peanut plants. Their feeding has extracted the last bit of moisture, what little was left, from already struggling plants. The ONLY solution is to DIG THOSE PEANUTS. We are very close to the normal peanut digging window for Virginia and with the dry conditions, there is no advantage to waiting. In normal years with normal soil moisture, we encourage growers to wait as long as possible to begin digging. By waiting, you allow nuts to gain more ‘meat’ content which improves the grade and value. Not so this year. In the near total absence of soil moisture, peanuts have essentially stopped maturing. What you have is it and you might as well dig. Some are waiting to dig until they get some moisture which will improve digging conditions. Fields with heavier natured ‘tight’ soils will be almost impossible to dig efficiently unless it rains. But I still do not recommend treating for mites. Their feeding has not compromised vine strength, which is the biggest concern late in the season. Where late season plant diseases can cause vines to deteriorate which causes them to shed pods during the digging process, spider mite feeding is not having the same effect. Even in fields with the heaviest infestations, vine strength has not been compromised. My advice, just dig them as soon as you can. But be prepared, after the vines are inverted, mites will move to the exposed tap roots. It will look bad, but it is of no economic importance.

Brown marmorated stink bugs found in more soybean fields

We have now documented brown marmorated stink bugs in soybean fields in at least 15 counties in Virginia. My guess is that if we had more time to look, we would find them in most of the others. The numbers are still low, 1 to 4/15 sweeps, and fields are in senescence, so there is no economic threat. Prior to this year, we had not found them in soybean fields. The bigger question in my mind has to do with next season. Is this low number going to increase significantly next year? I think the probability is high given the incredibly huge populations that are aggregating on and in homes and structures, trees and shrubs over most of the northern, western, and central parts of the state. Will these huge overwintering populations move into gardens and crops next spring? Based what has been reported from other areas, it appears that the answer is ‘yes’. One area of the state that has escaped these large overwintering aggregations is the coastal plain. Although we have found a few in crops and in black light traps, I have not seen or gotten complaint calls about large aggregations from homeowners from this region of the state. If the numbers do build in this area, will cotton become the next victim? Other native stink bugs species are highly attracted to cotton bolls and are capable of doing extensive damage. Will brown marmorated stink bugs join this complex? Time will tell and we will be monitoring closely next season.

Spider mite infestations picking up in peanut fields

It is not surprising that we are getting reports of spider mite build-ups in peanut fields. There are areas that have been fighting this dry weather pest for several weeks. These newer outbreaks are particularly bothersome as they are coming so close to the end of the season. D. Rick Brandenburg (NCSU) and I have done a lot of work on how to achieve the best control of spider mites in peanuts. There are several limiting factors, not the least of which is the limited number of products registered for spider mite control in peanut. There are only three products currently labeled, Danitol, Brigade and Comite. For reasons that must have to do with marketing, Comite has not been readily available to Virginia growers for the last 3 or 4 years. That leaves Danitol and Brigade (= Capture) which are both pyrethroids. These products if applied with high spray volume (15 + gpa) will provide good knockdown of adult and immature mites. But, neither kills the eggs so if applications are made to fields where there are a lot of eggs, these hatch in 2 or 3 days and the infestation begins again. Our work showed that the only way to make these products work well was to make two sequential applications about 5 to 7 days apart. The first application knocks down the adults and immatures, and the second gets the new hatchlings, thus breaking the cycle. But, this late in the season when digging will begin soon, we are recommending that if mites are doing a lot of damage and need to be controlled, make a single application using the highest labeled rate, knock them back, and hope for the best.

Soybean loopers finally beginning to phase out

Although there are still soybean loopers in a lot of fields, the numbers are declining. The larger worms are going into pupation and, thankfully, no new eggs are being deposited. For example, I visited several fields where last week the numbers were in the 15 to 20/15 sweep range and found only 2 or 3 larger worms remaining. Also, most of these fields were much closer to being mature enough to be in the ‘safe’ zone. I am still getting a few calls and am referring them to last week’s advisory note. One nice feature of our advisory is that it archives notes. To see last week’s note that provides guidelines for determining the need for late season looper treatment, go to www.sripmc.org/virginia and scroll down to the Sept. 9 soybean looper note.

Loopers keep coming–when will fields be safe from defoliation

Soybean looper calls are pouring in from all over the eastern half of the state. It is adding ‘insult to injury’—having to treat fields for the second, third, or even a fourth time in the most extreme cases and on top of that, many fields are so drought stressed they are struggling to stay alive.

When helping growers make the decision on whether to treat a field for loopers we have to take the time to consider several components that influence the decision: the maturity of the crop, the health of the leaf canopy, and the number of loopers present. Let’s take them one at the time. In terms of crop susceptibility, after some long discussions with soybean agronomists (David Holshouser at VT and Jim Dumphy at NCSU), we came up with a rule-of-thumb as to when fields are safe, that is, worms can be left untreated with no fear of lost yields. We suggest that fields will need to be protected as long as the pods are still green and until the lower leaves are just beginning to yellow. This should correspond, more or less, with the R6.5 stage (10 days after R6.0 = full green seed). If leaves are beginning to yellow up the stem, not from drought but from the maturity process, and there are any pods on the plant that are beginning to yellow, the field is safe, no need to treat. Next we have to determine the health of the leaf canopy, robust, average, or thin. Each can tolerate different amounts of leaf loss before reducing yield potential. Robust fields (mid chest or higher) can tolerate a lot of feeding. Average fields (upper thigh to mid chest) can tolerate normal amounts of feeding. Thin canopy fields (mid thigh or below) cannot tolerate additional leaf loss. Also in this canopy assessment, we need to take a stab at estimating the current percent defoliation. This is not an exact measure, but your best estimate looking over the entire canopy top to bottom. The ‘eyes’ tend to focus on those badly defoliated top leaves. Look beyond those and try to come up with an overall average. One thing we (and others) have noticed about soybean loopers is that their feeding is often in mid-canopy, not at the top like most other defoliators. All the more reason to inspect the entire canopy. Finally, how many loopers are present? There is not a single threshold because of all the factors we have just discussed, but a very general rule of thumb is that 15-20 or greater/15 sweeps constitutes a potential threat, depending on the maturity and canopy health. Thresholds vary quite a bit from state to state but this one falls pretty well in line with the other states’.

In considering these components, some fields will be no-brainers. Mature fields (late R6 or older) or fields with robust canopies and just a few loopers (10 or less/15 sweeps) can be left alone. On the other end of the spectrum, early R6 stage or younger fields with stressed, thin canopies and 15-20 or more loopers/15 sweeps need to be treated. This week in Virginia, there are a lot of fields in the ‘grey zone’ (plants are in the mid to late R5 to early R6 stage, the canopy is average, the looper number is in the 12-18 range, and defoliation is less than 20%). I tell folks, if they can do this, to take a close look at these fields and make a mental image of the extent of defoliation. Revisit in 2-3 days (no longer) to see if it has greatly increased. If the percent defoliation has increased and loopers are still present at or near the threshold, treat it. If the level of defoliation has not increased much and/or the looper numbers have decreased, don’t treat.

It all sounds pretty complicated and it is—but taking the time to consider these components should help determine if a field needs to be treated—some will and some won’t—and allow growers to protect at risk fields but save money on safe fields.

When will this looper flight end and what will stop it? I have been asked. I wish I knew. We need rain, badly, which will move fields to maturity and get us out of this mess.

Aphid and brown marmorated stink bug update

A couple of new things to report from our statewide soybean survey: soybean aphid has greatly exceeded the threshold (250 aphids/plant) in at least two fields in Gloucester County. Our scout has been watching this area closely for several weeks as it has been the ‘hot spot’ in the state. As of this week, the population has jumped. As the beans are still in the R4-R5 growth stage, we are recommending a pyrethroid treatment. Pyrethroids are effective in controlling this aphid species.

The scout also brought in samples of brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB) nymphs collected from soybean fields in three counties, Culpeper, Augusta and Clark. These are in the upper- central and northern Virginia. The counts were low in these fields, only about 1/15 sweeps, which is not alarming, but definitely warrants watching. Reports of huge masses of BMSB are starting to come in from places like Fairfax, VA with bugs massing on trees, especially maples, and vegetables of all kinds.

Corn earworm moths still flying in large numbers

Earworm moths are still flying. Trap catches are high in many areas, and windshields are spattered. One fellow commented that the other night coming home from a meeting, he had to stop twice to clean the moth gunk off his windshield. One observation, and I hope this holds, is that in the past this late season moth flight did not result in new worm infestations. A lot of insect behavior is relegated by environmental cues. Days are definitely getting shorter. Is this reduced photoperiod (shorter day length) causing moths not to lay as many eggs? Not sure, but for whatever reason, in my experience it has been rare to see worm infestations initiate in September. We are hearing of many fields with a few earworms, maybe left over from the earlier flight, but none with the huge numbers we had a few weeks ago. Let’s hope we are finally seeing the end of this pest, for this season at least.

Looper infestations over most of the state

Soybean loopers are now being reported in soybean fields across much of the eastern side of the state. In past years they were mostly confined to southeastern counties. This infestation has broken all the records in terms of intensity (as many as 100+/15 sweeps in some fields) and geography (now being reported from Middle Peninsula and Northern Neck counties). This must be due to the persistent hot, dry weather, and the high percentage of fields previously treated with insecticides.

Loopers are easy to identify but there is some confusion about their color. Soybean loopers have both a ‘green’ and a ‘black’ color phase (see the attached image). We are seeing both color phases in our samples. There may be some cabbage loopers (a completely different species) mixed in, but we have not verified this. There are no exact thresholds for loopers in soybean so treatment should be based on the amount of leaf feeding in relation to the size of the total canopy. But, a very loose rule of thumb could be that 20 or more per 15 sweep net sweeps may constitute a threat. Fewer than that, especially in tall, full canopy fields probably does not constitute a threat. Some fields are getting close to maturity with pods and leaves beginning to yellow. Loopers are not a threat to those fields. Pyrethroids should not be figured into a looper treatment decision. They are less than effective. If stink bugs are present in looper infested fields, I would consider adding Orthene to the looper insecticide. Orthene will provide good control of both green and brown stink bugs where the pyrethroid would miss some of the browns. Oddly, we are seeing more brown stink bugs in some fields than greens, which is opposite of what we are used to seeing.

We have initiated 5 different field trials to evaluate the effectiveness of many different insecticides/rates for loopers. Results will be presented at our annual Pre-Harvest Field Tour scheduled for Sept. 14.
Additional information: soybean-looper-color-phases-herbert-2010-ppt