Category Archives: Cotton

The Virginia Peanut-Cotton Infonet has moved (back)

InfoNetMap

The Virginia Tech Tidewater AREC (TAREC) maintains the Peanut-Cotton Infonet which provides growers in the region with daily weather data (e.g. temperature, rainfall), peanut leaf spot and Sclerotinia advisories, peanut heat units, cotton degree days, and a frost advisory. Four weather stations located in Suffolk, Capron, Skippers, and Waverly are maintained by the TAREC Plant Pathology program. These weather stations transmit data to a computer at the Tidewater AREC, and the data is used to run fungicide advisory models. Data are available on the Virginia Peanut-Cotton Infonet website (http://webipm.ento.vt.edu/cgi-bin/infonet1.cgi).

The data and information available here include:

Maximum, minimum, and average air temperatures
Average soil temperature at a 4 inch depth
Daily and accumulated (from May 1) peanut heat units
Daily and accumulated (from May 1) cotton degree-days
Daily and total seasonal (from May 1) rainfall
Last effective spray date for peanut leaf spot
Sclerotinia blight risk
Frost advisory (from September 25th to completion of harvest)

In addition to the data provided on the Infonet, current information on peanut diseases in the region and disease management recommendations will be provided here on this blog, so be sure to check back for updates.

Virginia Peanut-Cotton Infonet Update

The Virginia Tech Tidewater AREC (TAREC) maintains the Peanut-Cotton Infonet website (webipm.ento.vt.edu/infonet/) which provides growers in southeast Virginia with daily weather data (e.g. air and soil temperatures, rainfall, relative humidity), peanut leaf spot and Sclerotinia advisories, peanut heat units, cotton degree days, and a frost advisory. Four weather stations located in Suffolk, Capron, Skippers, and Waverly are maintained by the TAREC Plant Pathology program. Thanks to funding from the Virginia Peanut and Cotton Boards, we have been able to upgrade our equipment which should improve the overall reliability and consistency of data transfer from our weather stations. The new equipment has been installed and we are receiving data, but we are temporarily unable to post the data to the Infonet website. This technical issue should be resolved by next week, but in the meantime daily weather data will be sent out as an email to extension agents and posted to the Virginia Ag Pest Advisory Blog. We apologize for the inconvenience, and we are working hard to get the Peanut-Cotton Infonet website up and running for the season. If you have any questions or concerns feel free to call the TAREC Plant Pathology lab at (757) 657-6450 ext. 428 or email Dr. Hillary Mehl (hlmehl@vt.edu).

Please find below the current weather data for Suffolk, Capron, and Skippers. The Waverly data will be available shortly.

SE VA Weather Data 5-1-15

 

Cotton aphids found in North Carolina

I have gotten several calls reporting that aphid infestations are occurring in some cotton fields in northeast North Carolina.  To my knowledge, none have been reported from Virginia, but growers should be alerted.

In the ‘old’ days before Bt cotton, we typically treated cotton twice in August with pyrethroids for bollworm.  During those years is was not uncommon to see aphid ‘flares’ after those two sprays.  We know from ongoing research in soybean that pyrethroids are pretty devastating to most natural enemies (the many insects and spiders that attack and eat pest species).  We presumed that the bollworm sprays were suppressing natural enemies and ‘allowing’ cotton aphid populations to build.  So, is that what is going on this year in cotton?  We cannot be sure or course, but more growers are treating two, even three times for plant bugs and stink bugs, and in most cases they are using pyrethroids.  Are these reported aphid flare-ups related to multiple, close-interval pyrethroid sprays?  We cannot be sure but if this is the beginning of a trend, we need to reconsider some things, like—are all of the plant bug and stink bugs sprays warranted and based on actual insect pressure; could some be eliminated; should we be using neonicotinoid insecticides (which can help suppress aphids), either tank mixed or as combination products, for one or more of these sprays?

All good questions that will have to be addressed if the aphid situation gets worse.  Flaring a bad aphid problem will require more sprays, more money, and more bother.  We need to do whatever we can to prevent this problem.

Helicoverpa zea (aka corn earworm, bollworm) resistance monitoring update–Aug. 7, 2014

Our corn earworm/bollworm moth catches went up this week allowing us to conduct adult vial tests on 128 moths.  Vials were treated with the standard 5 microgram rate of cypermethrin (a pyrethroid insecticide), or acetone (the untreated check).  This week, 39.4% of moths survived the test, which is high.  The season-long average is now 35% survival (based on 190 moths evaluated) and is higher than what we saw in 2013 (see graphs, below).  Survivorship at this level indicates that non-pyrethroids may need to be considered when an insecticide is needed for this pest in some regions, so please keep this in mind when scouting and then making management decisions in the upcoming days.

AVT_7_Aug_2014

Results of the Corn Earworm Survey in Virginia Field Corn—2014

Annually, we conduct a survey to estimate Helicoverpa zea (corn earworm) infestation levels in field corn in mid- to late July. Corn is considered a nursery crop for corn earworm, allowing the pest to complete a lifecycle and then move on to other crops such as soybean, cotton, and peanut in August. Over 30 years of data show that there is a linear correlation between the infestation level in corn and the amount of soybean acreage that gets treated with insecticide for this pest.

To conduct the survey this year, the number of corn earworms found in 50 ears of corn was recorded in 5 corn fields in each of 29 counties, totaling 7,250 ears and 145 fields sampled. When fields were known to contain Bt or non-Bt corn, this was noted. Otherwise, samples were considered to be random and assumed to be representative of the actual Bt/non-Bt composition in each county. Age of corn earworms, or if they had already exited the ears, was also recorded (data not shown). We greatly appreciate the help of Virginia Cooperative Extension Agriculture and Natural Resource (ANR) Agents, Virginia Tech faculty and staff, and volunteers in this effort. These cooperators are acknowledged in the attached Figure. We also would like to thank the many growers who graciously allowed us to inspect their fields for corn earworm.

Results of the survey are provided below (click on the Figure to enlarge it). Statewide, approximately 20% of ears were infested with corn earworm. For comparison, 18% of ears were infested in 2013, 30% in 2012, 33% in 2011; 40% in 2010; and 36% in 2009. Regional averages for 2014 were 6% infested ears in Northern counties, 4% in the Northern Neck, 18% in Mid-Eastern, 17% in South-Central, 30% in the Southeast, and 17% on the Eastern Shore.

This survey is intended to be a representative sample, not a complete picture. We always recommend scouting individual fields to determine exactly what is happening in terms of corn earworm as well as other pests and crop problems. Also, please check the black light trap reports on the Virginia Ag Pest and Crop Advisory and other reports posted weekly to keep up-to-date on the insect pest situation.

Map of Virginia with levels of corn earworm larvae in field corn.

 

Cotton stink bug scouting card

Cotton stink bug update—July 24, 2014

We are finding (and hearing about) a few cotton fields that have reached or exceeded stink bug damage thresholds—not all by any means, but some. For the most part, these are fields in the 3rd or 4th weeks of bloom.  If you are following our recommended cotton stink bug thresholds, the threshold for the 3rd, 4th and 5th weeks of bloom is 10 percent internal stink bug damage.  The research that these thresholds are based on showed that these weeks are the most critical for boll production and the bolls present during this period are the most susceptible to stink bug feeding injury.

If you have not started checking fields for stink bug damage to bolls, you might want to consider starting.  In each field, pull a random sample of at least 25 bolls that fit in the ‘holes’ in our scouting card (contact us or your local extension office if you need a stink bug scouting card).  Using bolls in this size range guarantees that you are sampling the right boll population.  Crack each boll and inspect for internal stink bug feeding injury symptoms.

What products will give you the best control of stink bugs and longest residual activity?  Our field trials, and others, show pretty consistently that pyrethroids and products like Bidrin provide the best control.  Insecticides in the neonicotinoid class, if applied alone, are weak.  Although products do a decent job of killing the adults and nymphs, none provide much residual activity —even 7 days would be a stretch.  If adult stink bugs continue move in to field, more than one application may be needed.

Reports of Lygus bugs in cotton—a false alarm for Virginia

There is a lot of conversation about the big Lygus bug outbreaks in northeast North Carolina cotton, and that the pest is moving north. The first part is true. There are areas in NC that are experiencing Lygus bug pressure, especially in their eastern blacklands and in cotton fields near potato fields. The second part is not true. Lygus bugs do not migrate from south to north but are a localized pest that moves from host plant to host plant based on factors like—when the alternate host plants dry down (like weeds) or are harvested (like potatoes).
First, let’s be sure we know what bug we are talking about. Lygus lineolaris, or tarnished plant bug (a. k. a. —Lygus bug or plant bug) is a very common insect in our area. Small numbers of adults and nymphs can be found on almost any weed or crop that flowers. It is a small insect, about ¼ the size of an adult green or brown stink bug, that feeds in a similar manner to stink bugs by inserting its small beak into squares and bolls to extract plant fluids. Feeding can kill small squares and cause stink bug-like injury symptoms to small bolls. Lygus bugs can be a sever pest of cotton in some areas of the US like the Delta and Mid-south cotton states where growers battle this pest with 4 to 8 or more sprays each year. Infestation levels in the eastern states have always been much, much lower. Jack Bacheler, before he retired from NC State, used to quote total percentage cotton acreage treated annually for Lygus bugs to be on average only about 1 – 2 percent. In Virginia, I have only encountered or heard about a very few fields that were infested at levels that warranted treatment. The most recent was last summer on our Eastern Shore where a cotton field next to a potato field was damaged extensively when the Lygus bugs migrated out of the potatoes after they were dug. This is a ‘classic’ case, and one that occurs a lot in the potato production area of northeast North Carolina.
So, this ‘mysterious’ Lygus bug pest is not—mysterious, that is. We understand it, and we have good methods for determining if it is a real threat to a field. To scout for Lygus bugs you need to 1) check for missing squares (percent square retention), and 2) check for presence of adults or nymphs. Neither alone will give you the whole picture. You need to do both—check for missing squares, and check to see if bugs are active. Checking for only missing squares can mislead you because other stresses in the environment can cause small squares to shed (e.g., extreme heat, drought, periods of cloudy weather). Documenting the presence of Lygus bugs does not give the whole picture either because adults are extremely mobile and can rapidly move in and out of fields. Sometimes they may be present, but not causing square injury or loss.
Weekly checks of upper square retention is the most efficient way to assess if Lygus bugs can either be ruled out as an economic concern at that time or if sweep netting for the adults and nymphs is needed. An upper square retention rate of 80% or more usually indicates that Lygus bugs are not present at damaging levels. In most years in Virginia, percent square retention is very high – often in the mid to upper 90’s. A recent (July 1 and 2, 2014) check of 8 randomly selected fields showed they had greater than 95% square retention. If upper square retention is less than 80%, you should use a sweep net to sample in eight to 10 locations in the field away from the edge, looking for live adult and immature Lygus bugs. If a field has less than 80% square retention and an average of eight Lygus bugs per 100 sweeps, a spray is needed at that time. Remember that when cotton is approximately one week into blooming, a five-foot black beat cloth is a more accurate sampling devise than the sweep net for Lygus bug, especially the nymphs which show up as almost florescent green on the black cloth background.
If a threshold is met and a treatment is needed, here is an example of a spray plan shared by NC State. For the first Lygus bug spray pre-bloom, at squaring or first flower, consider using a stand-alone neonicotinoid product (common examples include Admire Pro, Belay, Centric, Intruder, Trimax Pro). These are generally softer on beneficial insects so conserve them. If Lygus bugs are still a concern later on, or require a second spray, first check to see that aphids are not common in the field. We have been lucky in VA with having very little aphid pressure in cotton in the last few years, but if aphids are present, you should not use a neonicotinoid again. Switch to a product like Carbine, Transform, or one of the more effective pyrethroids. If aphids are not a concern, you should still not use a stand-alone neonicotinoid product for a second spray, but should switch to one of the pre-mixed products (like Endigo, Leverage, Swagger, etc.) that also contain a pyrethroid, or an organophosphate/carbamate-only product (like Bidrin, Orthene, Vydate, etc.). Many of these products are also effective against stink bugs; eliminating stink bugs can be beneficial during the period of boll formation. The downside to these products is that they kill beneficial insects and put the field at higher risk for bollworm and spider mites—so if any of these products is used, be sure to scout these fields later in the season.