Category Archives: Cotton

Results of the Corn Earworm Survey in Virginia Field Corn—2014

Annually, we conduct a survey to estimate Helicoverpa zea (corn earworm) infestation levels in field corn in mid- to late July. Corn is considered a nursery crop for corn earworm, allowing the pest to complete a lifecycle and then move on to other crops such as soybean, cotton, and peanut in August. Over 30 years of data show that there is a linear correlation between the infestation level in corn and the amount of soybean acreage that gets treated with insecticide for this pest.

To conduct the survey this year, the number of corn earworms found in 50 ears of corn was recorded in 5 corn fields in each of 29 counties, totaling 7,250 ears and 145 fields sampled. When fields were known to contain Bt or non-Bt corn, this was noted. Otherwise, samples were considered to be random and assumed to be representative of the actual Bt/non-Bt composition in each county. Age of corn earworms, or if they had already exited the ears, was also recorded (data not shown). We greatly appreciate the help of Virginia Cooperative Extension Agriculture and Natural Resource (ANR) Agents, Virginia Tech faculty and staff, and volunteers in this effort. These cooperators are acknowledged in the attached Figure. We also would like to thank the many growers who graciously allowed us to inspect their fields for corn earworm.

Results of the survey are provided below (click on the Figure to enlarge it). Statewide, approximately 20% of ears were infested with corn earworm. For comparison, 18% of ears were infested in 2013, 30% in 2012, 33% in 2011; 40% in 2010; and 36% in 2009. Regional averages for 2014 were 6% infested ears in Northern counties, 4% in the Northern Neck, 18% in Mid-Eastern, 17% in South-Central, 30% in the Southeast, and 17% on the Eastern Shore.

This survey is intended to be a representative sample, not a complete picture. We always recommend scouting individual fields to determine exactly what is happening in terms of corn earworm as well as other pests and crop problems. Also, please check the black light trap reports on the Virginia Ag Pest and Crop Advisory and other reports posted weekly to keep up-to-date on the insect pest situation.

Map of Virginia with levels of corn earworm larvae in field corn.

 

Cotton stink bug scouting card

Cotton stink bug update—July 24, 2014

We are finding (and hearing about) a few cotton fields that have reached or exceeded stink bug damage thresholds—not all by any means, but some. For the most part, these are fields in the 3rd or 4th weeks of bloom.  If you are following our recommended cotton stink bug thresholds, the threshold for the 3rd, 4th and 5th weeks of bloom is 10 percent internal stink bug damage.  The research that these thresholds are based on showed that these weeks are the most critical for boll production and the bolls present during this period are the most susceptible to stink bug feeding injury.

If you have not started checking fields for stink bug damage to bolls, you might want to consider starting.  In each field, pull a random sample of at least 25 bolls that fit in the ‘holes’ in our scouting card (contact us or your local extension office if you need a stink bug scouting card).  Using bolls in this size range guarantees that you are sampling the right boll population.  Crack each boll and inspect for internal stink bug feeding injury symptoms.

What products will give you the best control of stink bugs and longest residual activity?  Our field trials, and others, show pretty consistently that pyrethroids and products like Bidrin provide the best control.  Insecticides in the neonicotinoid class, if applied alone, are weak.  Although products do a decent job of killing the adults and nymphs, none provide much residual activity —even 7 days would be a stretch.  If adult stink bugs continue move in to field, more than one application may be needed.

Reports of Lygus bugs in cotton—a false alarm for Virginia

There is a lot of conversation about the big Lygus bug outbreaks in northeast North Carolina cotton, and that the pest is moving north. The first part is true. There are areas in NC that are experiencing Lygus bug pressure, especially in their eastern blacklands and in cotton fields near potato fields. The second part is not true. Lygus bugs do not migrate from south to north but are a localized pest that moves from host plant to host plant based on factors like—when the alternate host plants dry down (like weeds) or are harvested (like potatoes).
First, let’s be sure we know what bug we are talking about. Lygus lineolaris, or tarnished plant bug (a. k. a. —Lygus bug or plant bug) is a very common insect in our area. Small numbers of adults and nymphs can be found on almost any weed or crop that flowers. It is a small insect, about ¼ the size of an adult green or brown stink bug, that feeds in a similar manner to stink bugs by inserting its small beak into squares and bolls to extract plant fluids. Feeding can kill small squares and cause stink bug-like injury symptoms to small bolls. Lygus bugs can be a sever pest of cotton in some areas of the US like the Delta and Mid-south cotton states where growers battle this pest with 4 to 8 or more sprays each year. Infestation levels in the eastern states have always been much, much lower. Jack Bacheler, before he retired from NC State, used to quote total percentage cotton acreage treated annually for Lygus bugs to be on average only about 1 – 2 percent. In Virginia, I have only encountered or heard about a very few fields that were infested at levels that warranted treatment. The most recent was last summer on our Eastern Shore where a cotton field next to a potato field was damaged extensively when the Lygus bugs migrated out of the potatoes after they were dug. This is a ‘classic’ case, and one that occurs a lot in the potato production area of northeast North Carolina.
So, this ‘mysterious’ Lygus bug pest is not—mysterious, that is. We understand it, and we have good methods for determining if it is a real threat to a field. To scout for Lygus bugs you need to 1) check for missing squares (percent square retention), and 2) check for presence of adults or nymphs. Neither alone will give you the whole picture. You need to do both—check for missing squares, and check to see if bugs are active. Checking for only missing squares can mislead you because other stresses in the environment can cause small squares to shed (e.g., extreme heat, drought, periods of cloudy weather). Documenting the presence of Lygus bugs does not give the whole picture either because adults are extremely mobile and can rapidly move in and out of fields. Sometimes they may be present, but not causing square injury or loss.
Weekly checks of upper square retention is the most efficient way to assess if Lygus bugs can either be ruled out as an economic concern at that time or if sweep netting for the adults and nymphs is needed. An upper square retention rate of 80% or more usually indicates that Lygus bugs are not present at damaging levels. In most years in Virginia, percent square retention is very high – often in the mid to upper 90’s. A recent (July 1 and 2, 2014) check of 8 randomly selected fields showed they had greater than 95% square retention. If upper square retention is less than 80%, you should use a sweep net to sample in eight to 10 locations in the field away from the edge, looking for live adult and immature Lygus bugs. If a field has less than 80% square retention and an average of eight Lygus bugs per 100 sweeps, a spray is needed at that time. Remember that when cotton is approximately one week into blooming, a five-foot black beat cloth is a more accurate sampling devise than the sweep net for Lygus bug, especially the nymphs which show up as almost florescent green on the black cloth background.
If a threshold is met and a treatment is needed, here is an example of a spray plan shared by NC State. For the first Lygus bug spray pre-bloom, at squaring or first flower, consider using a stand-alone neonicotinoid product (common examples include Admire Pro, Belay, Centric, Intruder, Trimax Pro). These are generally softer on beneficial insects so conserve them. If Lygus bugs are still a concern later on, or require a second spray, first check to see that aphids are not common in the field. We have been lucky in VA with having very little aphid pressure in cotton in the last few years, but if aphids are present, you should not use a neonicotinoid again. Switch to a product like Carbine, Transform, or one of the more effective pyrethroids. If aphids are not a concern, you should still not use a stand-alone neonicotinoid product for a second spray, but should switch to one of the pre-mixed products (like Endigo, Leverage, Swagger, etc.) that also contain a pyrethroid, or an organophosphate/carbamate-only product (like Bidrin, Orthene, Vydate, etc.). Many of these products are also effective against stink bugs; eliminating stink bugs can be beneficial during the period of boll formation. The downside to these products is that they kill beneficial insects and put the field at higher risk for bollworm and spider mites—so if any of these products is used, be sure to scout these fields later in the season.

Table with insecticides available for control of bollworm and stink bugs in cotton

We had a request to develop a list of the insecticides available for managing bollworm and stink bugs in cotton—sprays that will go out over the next few weeks. The reason is that with the many products, both single and mixed active ingredients (ai) and different amounts of ai per gallon, it is very confusing and hard for growers to make good selections. Making the best product choice means knowing what the active ingredients are, what they are designed to kill, and how much product is needed to apply enough ai per acre to achieve good results. The attached table provides that information. It was a collaborative effort and included input from Jack Bacheler and Dominic Reisig at NCSU. Please note that not all products are included and that the rates on the table are from the product labels. Hopefully this information will be useful.
Additional information: bw-sb-cotton-insecticides-2013-herbert-docx

Cotton insect situation update

Things are pretty quiet in cotton pest-wise with the exception of scattered fields with spider mites and reports (mostly from northeast North Carolina) of pockets of plant bug activity. We are not used to seeing spider mites in wet years and do not really understand the ‘why’. I have seen this in the past and have a couple of observations. One is that under these conditions it is very hard to achieve perfect control of spider mites regardless of the products used, but, mite injury is not a great concern since plants are vigorously growing. My recommendation is to hold off on treating unless 1) rainfall amounts decrease and we begin to see some drought stress, or 2) mite injury gets so bad that otherwise healthy leaves (mid and upper canopy) start to drop due to intense feeding. Injury to and dropping of lower leaves is not really to concerning as these lower leaves are not as important to overall plant health and will be shed in the natural maturing process.

We are not seeing much evidence of plant bugs in the fields we are checking, and not hearing about much from others. We assess plant bug activity by checking for bugs and determining percent square retention. Plant bugs target squares and feeding results in shed. The danger point is reached if retention drops below 80-85 percent—and the fields we have checked have greater than 90% retention.

At this point most cotton in Virginia is into the flowering stage. Once flowering begins, we shift our emphasis to boll protection. We will follow with more specific advice in the next few weeks.

The status of the insect pests of cotton in Virginia

Most cotton in Virginia planted before mid May has blooms at the tops of plants, has mature bolls and is safe from further damage by stink bugs or bollworms. Local estimates are that this describes about 75% of the acreage. The remaining 25% planted after May 15 has not cut out yet and still has some insect-susceptible bolls, but percentage of susceptible bolls on a plant goes down each day as more bolls mature. Most fields, whether BG2 or WideStrike, have been treated one time for bollworms/stink bugs. In most years, this single treatment is sufficient for protection until harvest. But each year is different. This year summer rainfall patterns and some relatively cooler temperatures in recent days have slowed maturity a bit, especially the later planted fields. Whereas in most years by this time we can find some open bottom bolls, few are visible this week. So, early planted cotton is safe, but late planted cotton needs to be scouted for another few weeks, and may require a second treatment.

What about top-crop growth? We are not expecting a lot of new top-crop growth but it can happen. Late season top-crop growth is most common in summers when cotton is heat/drought stressed during the summer and cuts out early, then begins regrowth as a response to late August early September rain. This was the case in a lot of fields last year. This top-crop presents a new set of insect susceptible bolls that is very attractive to the final season’s generation or worms and stink bugs. But in most cases, the top-crop does not have enough lint potential to warrant another insecticide treatment.

Bollworm eggs are in cotton fields—what is the best approach for treatments?

In cotton, we are beginning to find corn earworm (=bollworm) eggs in fields. This fits what we would expect given the increase in moth activity. This is a little earlier than normal. Over the past several years, we have seen egg lay start during the first week of August. I suggest that any sprays from this time forward should be directed to bollworm and stink bug. In the past, we have been able to get good control of bollworms in BG2 or Widestrike cotton varieties with a single application of a pyrethroid at the highest labeled rate for that product. Pyrethroids are also picking up most of any stink bugs that could be present. We time the application to coincide with what used to be the second spray in the old (pre-BG cotton days) egg threshold two-spray system (first app at egg threshold, the second in 5-7 days). A treatment 5-7 days after the old egg threshold is designed to target any worms that have escaped the Bt toxins, but would still be small enough to kill with the pyrethroids before doing any significant boll damage. Up until now (at least based on data up to 2011), the single high rate pyrethroid treatment has remained effective in cotton because (in my opinion), if timed correctly they are directed to a small number of small larvae—easier to kill and fewer to kill. We have field trials in place to continue monitoring this.

Update on cotton stink bugs

Most of our cotton is about 10 days to 2 weeks in to the blooming period. This is the perfect time to begin scouting for stink bug damaged bolls. We just completed 5 cotton field scouting clinics across our cotton region and it was not hard to find stink bug damaged bolls, and a couple of fields had high levels—30-40 percent internal stink bug damage. By the 3rd week of bloom, the threshold drops to 10 percent new damage and remains at 10 percent through the 5th week of bloom. These next three weeks (3rd, 4th and 5th weeks of blooming) are the most import time to scout and treat, if needed, cotton for stink bugs. Use the new cotton stink bug scouting card which provides the thresholds, scouting procedures and a template for determining the proper size of the bolls that should be used to make any treatment decision. If you don’t have one, contact your local Virginia Cooperative Extension Ag Agent—we will see that you get one.

Cotton thrips update–still ugly

We call this ‘Thrips Season’ for a good reason. Although we seem to be coming down from last weeks peak numbers of immatures (about 120-150 per 5 plant sample), we are still getting about 35-40 per 5 plants. The insecticide seed treatments, regardless of source, which were providing decent levels of control last week have broken and now have immature counts as high as or higher than untreated controls. We did not apply any additional foliar sprays to these seed treatments as we wanted to evaluate what levels of control they provide, but we recommend that growers do…and suggested that last week was the right week to pull that trigger. With this kind of heavy thrips pressure, no products are perfect and few are really good to excellent. There are a couple of pretty decent treatments but we will share more details at our tour next week (June 5, 9 am EST till noon), and more at winter meetings. We plan to take these trials to yield…data that tell you what worked and how well.