Category Archives: Commodity

Sugarcane aphid update—spread and control options

Sugarcane aphid has advanced as far north as Halifax County, North Carolina—about 30 miles south of the Virginia border. To prepare for the possibility of sorghum field infestations, we have pursued a Section 18, Emergency Exemption for the use of Transform insecticide. This process involved a lot of good cooperation by VDACS who put the request together and forwarded it to the US EPA. We are awaiting approval. If approved, Transform (sulfoxaflor) can be used at 0.75-1.5 oz/acre and has a 14 day preharvest interval. Having Transform will give us access to the two insecticides that most states are relying on to combat sugarcane aphid—Transform and Sivanto. Since controlling heavy infestations it is taking two applications, having these options provides insecticides with different chemistries—always a good strategy.

We do not know if sugarcane aphids have infested sorghum fields in Virginia as we do not have a statewide sorghum pest surveillance program. According to FSA records, 12,245 acres of sorghum are grown for grain in 45 different Virginia counties, ranging from as few as 10 acres to as many as 1,000 depending on the county (view the attachment for a summary and FSA web site acreage source). With a crop that is this variable and widespread, it will be up to growers, crop advisors and local VCE agents to check fields for sugarcane aphids. As we have mentioned in earlier advisories, the crop is vulnerable until harvest.

Please let us know if an infestation is found so we can track this pest for future program development.

Sorghum acreage 2015

BMSB and kudzu bug distribution maps for the week ending August 27, 2015

Brown marmorated stink bug and kudzu bug were found in soybean in several additional Virginia counties this week–please refer to the distribution maps below.  Fields at or above the BMSB threshold of 3 to 5 total adults + medium and large nymphs in a 2-minute visual count were found in the following counties:  Bedford (12 BMSB per sample), Shenandoah (8 BMSB), Nelson (4 BMSB) and Henry (3 BMSB).   Thanks to our scouts Ed Seymore and Jamie Hogue, and to ANR Agent Scott Reiter for their reports this week.  BMSB_map_27_Aug_2015KB_map_26_Aug_2015

Soybean disease update – frogeye leaf spot

I have received numerous reports of soybean fields with moderate to severe frogeye leaf spot (FLS) over the past several weeks. In most cases, the disease is showing up in fields planted to a FLS susceptible variety and/or in fields that have been in continuous soybean. FLS can cause significant yield loss in susceptible varieties, so fungicides may be needed to control the disease in high risk fields (see accompanying blog post “Foliar fungicide applications in soybean”). Unfortunately, FLS isolates resistant to strobilurin (QoI, Group 11) fungicides have been confirmed from some locations in Virginia, so fungicide control failures can occur if the proper fungicide chemistries are not selected as illustrated in the pictures below. A soybean fungicide efficacy table with ratings based on data from multiple field trials in multiple states can be downloaded below. We are currently surveying fields in Virginia for strobilurin-resistant FLS and will have data on the frequency and distribution of resistance later this year. In the meantime, it should be assumed that FLS will not be controlled by strobilurin fungicides, and other fungicide chemistries (e.g. triazoles) should be applied in fields with FLS either alone or in combination with a strobilurin. Keep in mind that strobilurin fungicides still provide good control of other diseases that can occur in soybean.

FLS - untreated

FLS – untreated

FLS - 2 fungicide applications

FLS – 2 fungicide applications

Soybean disease scouting & fungicide guide 2015

Foliar fungicide applications in soybean

If and when to make a foliar fungicide application is a decision soybean producers must make each growing season. Every year is slightly different, and it is difficult to predict whether or not a fungicide application will be profitable. However, the risk factors listed below can be used to make an educated decision of whether or not to spray. The greater the number of risk factors in your field, the more likely it is that a fungicide application will be profitable.

  1. Growth stage of the crop. Disease is most likely to impact yield during pod and seed development since this is when the yield of the crop is being formed. Fungicides are more likely to result in a yield response if disease occurs between the beginning pod (R3) and full seed (R6) growth stages, a period that lasts approximately 30 days. Results from research conducted in 2014 suggest that a fungicide application is most likely to result in a yield response if weather conditions (see #2 below) conducive for disease development occur within two weeks of the R3/R4 growth stage. Overall, the optimum timing for a fungicide is at the R3/R4 growth stage, though later applications can be beneficial if diseases develop later in the season. Fungicide applications after the R5 growth stage are not recommended.
  2. Weather conditions. Currently, research is being conducted to develop a weather-based fungicide decision aid for soybean. Infection, growth, and sporulation by foliar pathogens occurs when temperatures are moderately warm and during periods of rainfall or high humidity. To determine the relative disease risk based on weather conditions, find a source of hourly temperature, rainfall, and relative humidity data (e.g. Weather Underground or a personal weather station). If over the past week the following conditions occurred on two or more days, the risk of disease development in the crop is high:
    • Average daily temperatures from 65-80 °F AND
    • 10 or more hours of relative humidity at or above 95% OR a rainfall event
    These conditions have occurred in many areas throughout Virginia over the past week as storms have moved through. However, before making a fungicide application consider the other risk factors below.
  3. Susceptibility of soybean variety to disease. Soybean varieties vary in their susceptibility to diseases, and more susceptible varieties are more likely to need a fungicide to protect yield. Keep in mind that a variety may be relatively resistant/tolerant to one or a few diseases but susceptible to others, so be aware of which diseases are most likely to occur in your field (see #4 and #5 below).
  4. Field history. Soybean debris is a source of pathogen inoculum, so diseases will show up earlier and be more severe in fields planted to soybean year after year compared to those in rotation with corn or another crop. History of a particular disease in a field should also be considered since it is likely to occur year after year.
  5. Confirmation of disease in a field. If you see a foliar disease starting to develop in your soybean crop, it may be a sign that it is time to apply a fungicide. Scouting may be useful for some diseases such as frogeye leaf spot, but other diseases (e.g. Cercospora blight) do not show symptoms until long after infections have occurred. Fungicides are more effective when applied preventatively, but applications shortly after the onset of symptoms will slow the progress of the disease. Thresholds have not been established for frogeye leaf spot or other foliar diseases of soybean.
  6. Yield potential. This year some soybean fields got off to a poor start and never really recovered. If growth is poor and yield potential is low, you do not have much yield to protect and fungicide applications are less likely to be profitable. In contrast, if a crop has high yield potential, a fungicide application can help to maximize that yield, especially if the variety is susceptible to disease.

Sorghum insect pest update—and sugar cane aphid alert

Sorghum is susceptible to several insect pests. Both stink bugs and corn earworm are highly attracted to the heads once seed begin to form and both feed directly on those seed. Later planted sorghum is especially attractive to these pests as late sorghum heads offer a nutritious food source when many other host crops are reaching a stage that is no longer preferred.

We have seen sorghum heads in Virginia with large numbers of worms and severe head damage. We have also seen heads with stink bugs feeding. Growers should check all fields to determine if insecticide sprays are needed. The best and only efficient way to sample heads is to shake individual heads into a white 5 gallon bucket. Worms and stink bugs show up well in these buckets and can be easily counted. Sample several heads throughout the field and determine the average number of stink bugs and worms per head. Thresholds taken from several other states are pretty consistent:

Head worms (mostly corm earworm in Virginia)—an average of 2 worms per head

Stink bugs—2-4 per head at seed milk stage; 4-8 per head during soft dough stage

There are several insecticides labeled for use in sorghum that will provide good control of both pests. In general, pyrethroids are effective against stink bugs. To ensure the best control of corn earworm, use a non-pyrethroid such as Belt, Besiege, Prevathon, or Blackhawk.

IMPORTANT. Sugar cane aphid is also a potential problem for sorghum in Virginia. This is a new pest of sorghum in the US where it started in Texas and moved rapidly into the eastern states. Infestations have been reported as close to us as mid North Carolina and there is every indication that this pest could reach Virginia fields early enough to cause significant problems. These aphid populations can increase very rapidly and if numbers are high enough, the sticky ‘honey dew’ that they secrete while feeding can ruin heads and interfere with combines at harvest time. Please open and read the pdf below we have prepared that provides a lot of good information on this pest with color images to help with identification, sample procedures, thresholds, and recommended insecticides.

Sugarcane Aphid advisory_Aug_19

The Virginia Soybean Field Day is this Thursday

VIRGINIA SOYBEAN FIELD DAY
Thursday August 20, 2015

Eastern Virginia Agricultural Research & Extension Center
2229 Menokin Road
Warsaw, VA 22572
(804) 333-3485

Sponsored by
Virginia Soybean Association
Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station
Virginia Cooperative Extension

Join us to see the latest research on soybean varieties, disease and weed management, IPM and sorghum varieties. Experts will also demonstrate no-till drill maintenance and update you on the mid-Atlantic double crop initiative. Registration begins at 8:00 am and field tours begin at 8:50 am. The program will end at noon with a delicious meal by Nixon Catering.

Topics include:
– Soybean Disease Management – Dr. Hillary Mehl
– Soybean Weed Management – Dr. Mike Flessner
– Soybean Insect IPM – Mr. Mike Parish and Drs. Sean Malone and Ames Herbert
– No-Till Drill Maintenance – Mr. Keith Burgess
– Grain Sorghum Management – Dr. Joseph Oakes
– Roundup-Ready Public Soybean Varieties – Dr. Bo Zhang
– Mid-Atlantic Double-Crop Soybean Initiative – Dr. David Holshouser

We hope to see you there!

Bollworm treatments may be needed in Virginia cotton

As of last week, we found bollworm eggs in cotton fields in numbers high enough to indicate that fields may need to be treated. The bollworm (= corn earworm) moth flight from corn is light and spotty, but it does not take many moths to cause concern in cotton.

In the old days before Bt cotton, we relied on the two spray system to control bollworms—the first spray applied at egg threshold followed by an automatic second spray 5 to 7 days later. This system worked very well to protect cotton from economic levels of boll damage.

With the advent of Bt cotton varieties (now TwinLink, BG2 and WideStrike) we found that even with these technologies, there were enough worm escapes (worms not killed by feeding on the plant toxins) to warrant a single insecticide spray. And—we determined that the best time for that single worm spray coincided with the second of the original two spray system—i.e., 5 to 7 days after the egg threshold.

Egg thresholds were found towards the end of last week in fields near the Tidewater AREC. The same is likely happening in fields across the region. So now is the time for applying a bollworm treatment. Based on our history of bollworm resistance to pyrethroids, the best control results will be obtained using a non-pyrethroid (e.g., Steward, Belt, Prevathon, Blackhawk). But we also recommend adding a pyrethroid to clean up any stink bugs that may be in the cotton. There are several pyrethroid options, and I would use the highest labelled rate for stink bugs—better kill and longer residual. Besiege is the only product that contains both the non-pyrethroid (= Prevathon) with a pyrethroid (= Karate). With all the other non-pyrethroids, you will have to do the tank mixing on the farm. And, it is past time to include any of the insecticides from the neonicotinoid class as they do not provide good control of either bollworms or stink bugs.