Category Archives: Commodity

Soybean loopers are infesting soybeans in North Carolina

I have gotten reports that soybean loopers are already infesting soybean fields in North Carolina in large numbers. This is basically about a month earlier than we normally see them in this area of the US. Loopers migrate from the south and typically infest fields in Virginia in early to mid September, but based on what is happening in NC, we should be on the lookout.

We are also in a high risk environment for having looper infestations. We usually have more problems with them in dry seasons, and they most often develop in soybean fields that have been previously treated with pyrethroids. Our current research is proving what we have been suspecting—that pyrethroids are non-selective insecticides which kill many of the natural enemy species that feed on looper eggs and small larvae—which if undisturbed, can prevent outbreaks in many situations. So previously treated fields are at the highest risk to loopers.

If we begin to hear about infestations in Virginia, we will post updates and include some recommendations in terms of thresholds and products that will work best. But generally, you cannot get control of loopers with pyrethroids—none of them—so you will have to turn to non-pyrethroid options, and there are several.

Looper

TriCor Receives Registration for use in Wheat and Barley

The herbicide TriCor, a metribuzin product from United Phosphorus Inc., has received 24(c) registration (special local needs) for use in Virginia for control of Harmony and Harmony Extra (group 2 herbicides) resistant common chickweed. The supplemental label is here: TriCor DF Herbicide 24(c) VA label. This is good news for small grains growers.

Research by Drs. Scott Hagood and Michael Flessner indicate that TriCor at 2 oz/a results in excellent common chickweed control when applied in fall or spring, with no significant injury to wheat. However, wheat injury can be a concern. Using crop oil concentrate or vegetable oil surfactants with TriCor increases the risk of crop injury, as well as when applying with fertilizer in combination with TriCor. Growers should select wheat and barley varieties that are tolerant of metribuzin if planning on using TriCor as certain varieties are more sensitive to metribuzin than others. Seed dealers may have information regarding metribuzin tolerance. Additionally, preliminary nonreplicated wheat variety sensitivity research by Drs. Wade Thomason, Carl Griffey, and Michael Flessner is included in this publication: https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/CSES/CSES-129/CSES-129-PDF.pdf. See pages 99 to 101.

Always make sure to read and follow the product label. Also note that TriCor is the only stand-alone metribuzin product legal for this use.

Example of wheat variety differences in sensitivity

Example of wheat variety differences in sensitivity to metribuzin. Thomason 2015.

Update on soybean insect pests in Virginia

In mid July we initiated our annual soybean insect pest survey, our black light trapping program, and our corn earworm pyrethroid resistance monitoring program. Following are short updates.

BMSB (brown marmorated stink bug): So far this summer, only a TOTAL of 4 BMSBs have been found in soybeans—one in a field in Amelia Co. and 3 in a field in Bedford Co. (see the attached BMSB occurrence map). This breaks all records for the fewest for this time of year. Was it the cold winter, or those unusually hot days in June (BMSB does not do well when temperatures exceed the mid 90s)? We will continue posting our field survey results but all indicators point to a season with very low risk to BMSB infestations in the Virginia soybean crop.  BMSB_map_30_July_2015

Kudzu bug: As of the end of July, kudzu bugs have been found in soybean fields in 21 southern/eastern counties (see the attached kudzu bug occurrence map)—but in all cases, these have been adults only, and at very low numbers. Most counts reported by our scouts were 1 or fewer adults in 15 sweeps, and occasionally 2 per 15 sweeps. These numbers are way too low to be a threat to fields and DO NOT warrant treatment. These adults represent the first generation that will set up the nymphs that could cause concern later, but only if numbers increase a lot. Our best guess based on what we are seeing in fields now, and the lower number that successfully overwintered compared with last year, is that not many, if any, fields that will reach the nymphal threshold.  KB_map_30_July_2015

Corn earworm moth activity: We are seeing an increase in CEW moth activity just in the last week and what we think is the beginning of the flight from field corn. Our local pheromone traps have gone from just a few caught in a week, to averaging in the teens and twenties. We are just beginning to see moths fly up in crop fields as we walk the rows, and some local growers are seeing the same. On a separate advisory we have posted the results of the annual corn earworm field corn survey—which showed a statewide average of only 17.5% ears infested. This is even lower than the numbers reported in 2014 (20%) and 2013 (18%)—both years with very few cotton, peanut or soybean fields being infested with treatable numbers of worms. So far, all indicators point to another year with few fields reaching thresholds. We will continue monitoring and posting updates.

Corn earworm pyrethroid resistance: To date we have tested 255 moths (see the attached line graph). We started the season with about 15% survivorship at the end of June and as of the end of July are up to 40% survivorship. This level, this early in the season is cause for some concern. We will be posting updates often.  Vial_tests_30_July_2015

Corn disease update — July 28, 2015

In an update to my previous post, southern corn rust has now been confirmed in Chesapeake, VA. This is a few days earlier than in 2014 (August 3), but most of the field corn in the region is mature enough (dent stage) that yield should not be impacted. Late planted corn in fields with good yield potential (120 bu/ac +) may need to be protected with a foliar fungicide. Strobilurins are good preventative fungicides whereas triazoles are recommended once sporulation is observed in a field due to their curative activity. A combination fungicide is a good option as long as a strobilurin fungicide has not been applied previously. Wet, warm weather favors disease development. Once sporulation occurs, symptoms of rust are relatively obvious. Lesions start out as raised, blister-like pustules then break open to reveal orange spores. Samples of corn plants with symptoms of southern rust can be submitted to the disease clinic at the Virginia Tech Tidewater AREC (contact Dr. Hillary Mehl, hlmehl@vt.edu).

Unusual yellow peanut color

I have recently seen several peanut fields or spots in the fields around the Tidewater AREC with yellow plants resembling nitrogen deficiency. Colleagues in North Carolina are also getting concerned with peanuts needing late season nitrogen applications. Similarly, in one of my research fields we noticed a part of the field with yellow plants resembling nitrogen deficiency next to dark green plants for the rest of the area. Indeed, early this summer Kelvin Wells, Extension Agent in Sussex county VA, brought in some samples of yellow peanut plants. Right away I identified nitrogen deficiency because there were no nodules on the roots and plants were starting blooming; also the farmer did not inoculate at planting. It was easy. But with the plants from my own field trial it is not so easy! Yellow and smaller plants had larger nodules than the bigger and greener plants and in a similar number on July 17 when I checked. Nodules from both plants, green and yellow, were dark red when cut, indicating active nitrogen fixation (pictures are attached here Unusual peanut color). The green plants were planted on May 10 and the yellow ones on May 22. I really do not have any other explanation than probable negative effect of high temperatures and dry conditions experienced by late planted peanuts in Virginia this year. This could have affected root growth and nodulation for young seedlings and carried nutritional imbalances over to later stages.

Corn disease update – July 26, 2015

Much of the field corn in the region is near or at the dent stage and no longer at risk for yield loss from foliar diseases. One disease I frequently receive questions about is southern corn rust. Southern corn rust is a potentially aggressive disease, but the fungus does not overwinter in Virginia and it is typically seen late in the growing season if at all. In 2014, southern corn rust was confirmed in Virginia on August 3, which is relatively early compared to other years. As of this week, southern corn rust has been confirmed from four North Carolina counties (Hyde, Lenior, Beaufort, and Camden) but it has not been observed in Virginia. We very well may see southern corn rust in southeastern Virginia within the next couple of weeks, but there is no need to panic. Yield of corn at or near the dent stage is unlikely to be impacted by the disease, but late planted corn in fields with good yield potential (120 bu/ac +) may need to be protected with a foliar fungicide. Strobilurins are good preventative fungicides whereas triazoles are recommended once sporulation is observed in a field due to their curative activity. A combination fungicide is a good option as long as a strobilurin fungicide has not been applied previously. Wet, warm weather favors disease development. Once sporulation occurs, symptoms of rust are relatively obvious. Lesions start out as raised, blister-like pustules then break open to reveal orange spores. Samples of corn plants with symptoms of southern rust can be submitted to the disease clinic at the Virginia Tech Tidewater AREC (contact Dr. Hillary Mehl, hlmehl@vt.edu).

Southern corn rust

Southern corn rust

July 23, 2015 update for brown marmorated stink bug and kudzu bug survey of soybean

In soybean, our scouts have detected BMSB in Bedford, and kudzu bug in Brunswick, Campbell, Cumberland, Dinwiddie, Greensville, Nottoway, Prince Edward, Suffolk, and Surry.  Kudzu bug has been observed on other hosts (i.e., kudzu) in Appomattox, Buckingham, Isle of Wight, and Southampton.  Please see the attached maps for further details.  BMSB_KB_23_Jul_2015

Black light trap captures for the week ending July 23, 2015

Corn earworm moth captures were low this week, ranging from zero to 0.7 per night.  BMSB catches ranged from zero to 2 per night.  Please see the attached file for the data tables.  Thanks to the following for their reports this week:  Mary Beahm (Warsaw), Scott Reiter (Prince George), David Moore and intern Taylor Sabo (Middlesex), Austin Brown (Southampton), and Dr. Herbert and the entomology crew in Suffolk.  BLT_23_Jul_2015

Should I Apply a Foliar Feed to My Soybeans?

The high prices over the last few years have allowed many of us to experiment with certain practices that, at best, might occasionally increase yields.  The return of investment usually only required one bushel (or less), depending on the input.  But that was when soybeans were $13, $15, and even $17 per bushel.  But now, you may be able to sell your crop for $10-11 (if you still have any in storage) and the future prices are reflecting record acreages.

So, it seems that I’ve been asked, “Should I apply a foliar feed to my soybeans?” more this year than in the past few years.

First, I still stand by what I’ve said in the past and still say today: “Feed the roots and not the foliage.”  Soybean will remove 3 to 4 lbs of nitrogen, 0.8 lbs of phosphorus, and 1.4 lbs of potassium per bushel of seed produced.  These large amounts will need to come via root uptake; it is not economically possible to apply these amounts through the foliage.

But, once the soil needs are met, will additional fertilization help?

First, an application of Manganese may be needed if your soil pH inches much above 6.5.  2010-07-20-Mn-Deficiency-002webI’ve even seen Mn deficiencies when the pH is as low as 6.2 (using fall/winter soil test levels) and the soil is “wet natured” or if lime was recently applied.  There are also certain varieties that tend to show Mn deficiency sooner than others.  So, if you see the characteristic interveinal chlorosis of Mn deficiency or if soybean are growing in a field that typically exhibits such a deficiency, then spray Mn.

Another issue that I’m seeing this year is a general yellowing of plants, usually just in seemingly random spots in the field.  Upon closer inspection, these are usually very wet areas (there are plenty of those this year) or sandy knolls.  In the saturated soils, the yellowing is likely due to lack of oxygen and/or poor nodule development.  The only cure for lack of oxygen is for the soil to dry out.  Poor nodulation is indirectly a response to lack of oxygen – the nitrogen-fixing bacteria have temporarily stopped functioning.  But they will recover and provide the nitrogen when the plant needs it the most, when the pods are forming and seed are filling.  Will a shot of foliar nitrogen help?  Yes, it will green up the plant if lack of nitrogen is the problem.  Will this shot of nitrogen (assuming that nitrogen is the problem) increase yield?  Maybe.  Maybe not.  If lack of oxygen is the problem, then probably not.  Even if lack of nitrogen is the problem, probably not.

I want to caution everyone to not make assumptions that lack of nitrogen is the problem.

Is this N or S deficiency?

Is this N or S deficiency?

The only way to know for sure is to take a tissue sample. A deficiency that closely resembles nitrogen deficiency is sulfur.  On those sandy knolls, I’ve seen sulfur deficiencies.  Sulfur will leach just like nitrogen.  But, soybean will not produce its own sulfur.  A shot of nitrogen would do nothing to help in this case.  The take home message is to determine the cause, then act on that information.

But what about other nutrients?  What if there is no visual symptoms of nutrient stress?  What if my yield potential is very good?  My attitude towards this is that it usually won’t hurt (but be careful mixing with other chemicals), so do what makes you sleep better at night.  If you think it is helping your crop, then make the application.  It’s your money.  You know your fields better than anyone.  But, I have rarely seen a response to foliar feeds if you have maintained adequate soil fertility levels and have managed the crop for maximum economic yields.  Again, yield response to foliar fertilizers is, at best, inconsistent.