Mid-Atlantic Crop Management School Registration

The program for the 2015 Mid-Atlantic Crop Management School (MACMS) has now been set and the online registration website is now active. Everyone is welcome to attend! Virginia nutrient management credits and Certified Crop Adviser (CCA) credits will be offered. Local and regional farmers, independent consultants, certified crop advisers, nutrient management consultants, and agency and university professionals will join together to learn the latest on a wide range of topics from local, regional, and national speakers.

The Mid-Atlantic Crop Management School (MACMS) will be held from Nov. 17 to Nov. 19, 2015 at the Princess Royale in Ocean City Maryland. Some of the notable speakers include Dr. Bob Nielsen (Mr. King Corn) from Purdue University, Dr. Dewey Lee from the University of Georgia, Dr. David Langston from Virginia Tech, Dr. Randy Taylor from Oklahoma State University, Dr. Gordon Johnson from University of Delaware, Dr. Jarrod Miller from University of Maryland Extension, Mr. Mark Dubin from University of Maryland Extension and U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Dr. Scott Bretthauer from the University of Illinois, and many others.

Register for MACMS online at: https://www.SignUp4.net/public/ap.aspx?EID=20154802E. If you prefer a pdf version of the MACMS brochure, please email Richard Taylor at rtaylor@udel.edu.

Sessions on pest management, crop management, soil and water management, fertility management and some interactive sessions will be offered. Certified Crop Adviser (CCA), Nutrient Management, and Pesticide credits are available. Continuing education credits are available from a number of states in the region including Delaware, Maryland, West Virginia, Virginia, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. There are 43 different talks to choose from over the 2.5 day school. Some of the topics that will be covered are:

Effects of Stress on Corn Early in the Season

High Yield Soybeans: Is There a Recipe? A Roundtable Discussion

Row Crop Planters – Wider, Faster, or Both

A Path to Higher Yields: Part ll. Reducing Stress through Plant Health and Management

Lime Rate and Its Relationship to Fertility and Soil Type

Nitrogen Release from Non-chemical Fertilizers

The Intersection of Cover Crops and Weed Control

Future Technologies for Herbicide Resistance Weed Management

Understanding and Identifying Stalk Rots in Corn

Fumigant Control of Nematodes in Vegetables

Pest Management Trivia Challenge

Delaware’s Cropland Transect Survey – We’re Looking for Residue, Have You Seen Any?

Soil Health Principles and Manure Incorporation

Water Quality Trading in the Chesapeake Bay

Drainage Basics and Drainage Water Management

Forage and Field Crop Identification Hands-On Workshop

Evaluating Quality in Fruits and Vegetables Hands-On Workshop

Produce Food Safety Hands-On Workshop

Using Crop, Soils, Pest, and other Ag Apps on Your Tablet or Mobile Phone Hands-On Workshop

If you have questions, please contact us.

Dr. Richard W. Taylor
Extension Specialist—Agronomy
Dr. Amy Shober
Extension Specialist—Nutrient Management
University of Delaware
Email: rtaylor@udel.edu and ashober@udel.edu

Lodging and It’s Effect on Soybean Yield

As I’ve driving throughout Virginia these past few weeks, one thing that is evident is the large amount of vegetative growthDrought Painter 20150908_082955 web on our full-season soybean.  While adequate vegetative growth is necessary for maximum yield, it can work against the crop in seasons that experience August/September droughts.   In much of Virginia, soil moisture was depleted rapidly due to this large amount of growth and the lack of rain in August and September resulted in pod and seed abortion.  I’ve seen many fields that look relatively good from the windshield, especially after some rains perked up the plants.  But, closer examination revealed few pods or few seed in the pods.  In general, I think that farmers will be disappointed in their full-season yields.

On the other hand, timely rains during August and/or September in sohigh-yield soybeanme parts of Virginia allowed these full-season soybean to match this seemingly excessive growth with lots of pods and seed.  In such scenarios, 60 to 80 bushels per acre are possible. The only thing that may work against such a crop is, ironically, excessive vegetative growth that is causing or might lead to lodging.  I always remind those that complain about lodging that 20 bushel soybean do not usually lodge.

Now we have Hurricane Joaquin bearing down on us.  This could greatly change our yield potential, especially in our large full-season soybean with a good pod and seed set that is not yet fully mature.  With this in mind, I thought that I would review lodging’s effects on soybean yield.

How much will the lodging cost us in yield?  This will depend on the degree of lodging and the stage that the soybeans were in.  In general, I’d say that our full-season crop is rapidly approaching maturity.  Fields planted to earlier maturity groups are physiologically mature (R7, 98-100% of the final yield has accumulated), some are ready for harvest.  Many fields are still in the R6 (full seed) stage.  Most double-crop soybeans are in the R5 (beginning seed, seed are not yet touching in the pod) and R6.  Yield is most severely affected by lodging when the lodging occurs at the R5 stage.  Although yield is still affected at R6, yield losses are only half as severe at this stage.  Although at a more susceptible stage, double-crop soybeans are much shorter and will not likely have as severe lodging as more full-canopied full-season soybean.

So, what’s my estimate on the amount of yield loss?  First, we have to distinguish harvest or traffic loss from physiological yield loss.  Harvest losses can vary anywhere from 3-10% depending on many factors.  In some cases, we may have to run the combine of the most severely lodged soybeans in one direction.

There is little data on physiological yield loss, but what’s out there seems to be pretty consistent.  What do I mean by physiological yield loss?  That’s the loss in yield from lodging if all of the soybeans that are now on the plant can be harvested.  In controlled studies where researchers simulated lodging and compared it to a crop that was artificially supported, losses have ranged from 0% to over 30%.  Why such a range in yield loss?  It depends on the severity of lodging and the stage of development in which the lodging occurred.

Let’s first address the severity of lodging.  Soybean researchers have traditionally rated lodging on a scale of 1 to 5 as follows:

1.0          = almost all plants erect

2.0          = either all plants leaning slightly, or a few plants down

3.0          = either all plants leaning moderately (45O angle), or 25-50% down

4.0          = either all plants leaning considerably, or 50-80% down

5.0          = all plants down

Yield loss will be minimal unless most plants are leaning at a 45O angle or more.  Otherwise, yield losses can range from 10-35%, depending on the stage in which the lodging occurred.

Why does lodging cause yield loss?  It’s not completely clear, but the generally accepted reason is a reduction in net photosynthesis.  With less photosynthesis, there is less energy going to the developing pods and seeds.  When plants are lodged, relatively less of the upper leaves and more of the lower leaves are exposed to sunlight.  The upper leaves are more photosynthetically active and the lower leaves are less active.  When lodging occurs, the entire energy-producing mechanism is disturbed.  In other words, we are now exposing less of the most productive leaves and more of the least productive leaves to the sun.  So, yield will decline.

Let’s assume that lodging rated above 3.0 will cause a 10-30% loss.  Now the severity of the yield loss will depend on the development stage that the soybean plant was in.  As I said earlier, there’s little hard data on this subject, but a few older experiments give us some information.  In a study conducted in 1972-73, S.J. Woods and M.L. Swearingin of Purdue University indicated that the R5 stage was the most critical time for lodging to occur.  At this stage, yield was reduced by 18-32%.  At stages R3 and R6, yield was reduced by 12-18% and 13-15%, respectively.  Details of that experiment are shown to the right.

In that study, the plots were manually lodged with a long aluminum bar at the indicated soybean stage.  Although lodging ratings were not given, I would consider it to be in the 3.5 to 4.0 range from the description given.  Two varieties were tested. ‘Corsoy’ was more susceptible to lodging, but was able to branch more; therefore, it yielded higher when lodged.  ‘Wells’ is more resistant to lodging, but did not branch as much; therefore, was unable to compensate as much for the lodging.  In the natural lodged plots, only slight (2.0 or less) lodging occurred.

From the above data and a few other studies, I’d estimate that where lodging is moderate to severe and the soybean are in the early R6 stage, we could lower our yield potential by 10-15%.  If the plants are still in the R5 stage and lodging is severe, losses could be 15-25%.  If soybeans are in even later stages (mid-R6), yield loss will be less.  If physiologically mature (R7, one pod on the plant has reached is final mature color), 98 to 100% of the dry matter has accumulated and losses will be nearly zero (assuming no harvest losses).  Most of our full-season soybeans are close to physiological maturity (R7).  Plus, plants with fewer leaves lodge less.

In summary, there may be some yield loss due to Hurricane Joaquin.  Yield losses will be greater with later maturity groups or in double-crop acres that have good growth.  But, hopefully, the hurricane will move off the coast and the only soybean we need to worry about lodging are those with very high yield potential.

Sugarcane aphid update

 

Sugarcane aphid (SCA) infestations have been documented in sorghum fields in 5 Virginia counties (Suffolk, Southampton, Surry, Sussex, and Isle of Wight—see infestation map, below). The area of the infestation likely includes more counties, but this is just a guess. Fortunately we are late into the season and many fields have either been harvested or desiccated in preparation for harvest. We maintain that there are fields still at some risk—those that will not be harvested for several weeks, especially any late planted fields. We are not concerned about loss caused by direct feeding, but the build-up of honey dew and sooty mold on leaves and heads. SCA infestations begin on lower leaves and these are not as important at this point in the season and pose less risk if they get covered with sooty mold. But if infestations move up the plant to upper leaves and heads, problems with combining could occur.

If you have been keeping up with pervious advisories you know that the insecticides most commonly recommended for control of SCA are Sivanto (Bayer CropScience) and Transform (Dow). But only Sivanto is currently labeled. We attempted to secure a Section 18 Emergence Exemption for the use of Transform but hit a snag. Following are the recent comments from the EPA reviewer regarding the status of our request. “Due to the federal court’s recent (September 10th) decision vacating EPA’s unconditional registration of sulfoxaflor the authorization of our request is on hold and remains pending.  The EPA is reviewing the court’s opinion to determine their next steps”. So, right now it does not sound promising for the Section 18 use of Transform in Virginia before the end of the use season.  It definitely means we don’t have use of the product for the recently found infestations. So Sivanto would be the best alternative, but hopefully, fields will not have to be treated.

SCA_map_24_Sep_2015

Helicoverpa zea (corn earworm/bollworm) adult vial test update for Sep. 24, 2015

We’re not catching many moths in our pheromone traps this time of year, but we are still conducting the adult vial tests on those that we do catch.  We are currently seeing many more dead moths after 24 hours of exposure to the pyrethroid insecticide, cypermethrin, at the 5 microgram per vial rate.  Less than 20% as you can see in the line graph below.  For the season, the average survival rate is 33.4% (bar chart, below).

CEW_AVT_24_Sep_2015_aCEW_AVT_24_Sep_2015_b

Sugarcane aphids found in sorghum field in Suffolk, Virginia

Dr. Ames Herbert confirmed the presence of sugarcane aphids, Melanaphis sacchari, in a sorghum field at the Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center in Suffolk, Virginia, on Sep. 17, 2015. Sugarcane aphid spreads as winged adults on wind and storm fronts so infestations can spread rapidly—so to be on the safe side, sorghum fields should be scouted.

There are several other aphid species that can infest sorghum but sugarcane aphid can be differentiated from the others being smooth, cream yellow, with two, short dark cornicles (“tailpipes”) on the hind end.

Research by Mike Brewer, Texes AgriLife, and David Kerns, LSU, has provided the most up-to-date Econominc Injury Level (EIL) of 50 to 125 aphids per leaf at sorghum prices of $4/bu; and the currently recommended Economic Threshold (when the insecticide needs to be applied to prevent the population from reaching the EIL) of 25 – 30% infested plants with 50 aphids per leaf.

After heading, according to work in other states, one of the more effective insecticide products is Sivanto (Bayer CropScience). Please refer to the Section 2(ee) Recommendation for the lower (but effective) rate of Sivanto @ 4-7 oz/A here: http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ldC4K023.pdf (please take note of the pre-harvest intervals and other directions found in the Section 2(ee)).

BMSB and kudzu bug soybean scouting report update for Sep. 16, 2015

Scouts Ed Seymore and Jamie Hogue have found multiple soybean fields in Virginia this week (early to mid-September) with threshold levels of brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB)–please refer to the figure for locations and numbers, noting that the columns for BMSB nymphs and BMSB adults need to be added together for calculating threshold numbers (more on that below).  Of course this is just a small sample of the fields out there, but their reports stress the need to scout your fields, especially those fields at the late R4 growth stage (full pod, where pods are 3/4-inch [2-cm] long at one of the four uppermost nodes) and at R5 (beginning seed, where seed is 1/8-inch [3-mm] long in the pod at one of the four uppermost nodes on the main stem).

Due to their concentrations along field edges, BMSB should be sampled using 2-minute visual counts, 15-sweeps with a net, or beat cloth (wide rows only), by walking 10-20 feet into a field, taking several samples in different parts of the field edge, and determining the average.  The thresholds for BMSB (adults + medium and large nymphs) in soybean, where BMSB is the predominant species, is 3-5 in a 2-minute visual count; 3-5 per 15 sweeps; or 0.5 per row foot using a beat cloth.  If a threshold is met, an edge-only insecticide treatment with a labeled pyrethroid, carbamate, or organophosphate at the R5 soybean growth stage can provide high levels of control.  As always, please be sure to read and follow the label.

Note that if your sampling finds a mix of stink bug species (e.g., BMSB, green, and brown) throughout the field, use thresholds of 5 per 15 sweeps or 1 per row foot (total all species, adults and nymphs).

KB_BMSB_16_Sep_2015Kudzu bug numbers are generally low.

Late-Season Drought Hurting Soybean in Virginia

I had never seen fields as wet as they were back in the second week of July.  But, things change very rapidly.

In August, it appeared that full-season yield potential was 60 to 80 bushels per acre.  Growth was excellent and the crop was loaded with pods and seed.  Likewise, corn yield potential was excellent.  Double-crop soybean did not look nearly as good, struggling with general poor growth due late planting, wet feet early, and dry soils later.

Now the situation is just the opposite.  Well almost – corn yields are coming in very good.  But, pods and seed on our full-season soybean crop are rapidly aborting due to the dry weather.  Leaves are falling.  It appears that the crop is maturing more rapidly.  This is not a good thing as yield strongly depends on the length of seed filling.  I’ve even seen some soybean dying in the corners of center pivots on the Eastern Shore.  Irrigation will definitely pay off this year.  As shown in the precipitation deficit map, we are below our seasonal average rainfall over the past 60 days.

This photo was taken this past Tuesday 8:30 am in the Official Variety Test at our Eastern Shore AREC. ? It looks like maturity group 3 varieties will out-yield group 4s, which will yield better than group 5s.  However, a timely rain this week may salvage the late 5s.  I don’t expect yields to top 40 bushels and they could possibly be less than 20 bushels if the drought persists.

On the other hand, I feel much better about double-crop soybean.  Although there is little growth, these soybean are not showing signs of drought, at least not to the extent of the full-season crop.  This photo is from the field adjacent to the full-season soybean shown above.

?The main reason for this lack of visual stress is less vegetative growth (usually not an advantage) pulling less moisture from the soil.  We also started the season with a soil profile full of water, but not excessive moisture (probably because the wheat had more-or-less depleted the soil moisture by May).  Furthermore, these double-crop soybean are just now entering the pod and seed development stages.  The seed is not yet requiring great amounts of water.  These soybean can also “wait” for a rain as, at this time, there are still excess pods on the plant.

Below are a few more images that show flower, pod, and seed abortion.

The number of seed per acre controls yield most – the number of seed is mainly ?controlled by the the number of pods at harvest; seed per pod has less effect.  Seed size can also greatly affect yield, but not to the extent of seed number.  With late-season rains, we can still increase seed size substantially, especially where there has been lots of seed and pod abortion.

?

Is there anything to be done about this?  No, not really – short of irrigation.  There’s nothing that you can apply to relieve the stress.  But, we can learn from such devastating experience and apply these learnings to the future.

  • First and foremost, diversify.  Although early-maturing varieties don’t usually do as well in full-season systems as those best adapted to a given area, it may be worth it to devote some acreage to such varieties.  It may also help to plant a few varieties that mature a little later than the ones you normally plant.
  • Keep double-crop small grain-soybean systems in your cropping mix.  Not only will it increase total income and improve your soils without a cover crop, it will reduce risks by diversifying your crop mix.
  • Review university, on-farm, and company variety test results to help select drought-tolerant varieties.  Not since 2010 have we seen drought to this extent in our variety tests; therefore, we have little information on how current varieties perform under drought stress conditions.
  • Other stresses such as vascular disease and nematodes will greatly enhance the effects of drought.  Identify those poor-yielding fields or parts of fields and take corrective actions next year.
  • Improve your soils with no-till and cover crops.  Better soil structure, more organic matter, and better chemical and biological activity will minimize drought stress.

 

 

Tidewater AREC Pre-Harvest Field Crops Tour – Sept 17

Thursday, September 17, 2015 – 8:00 a.m.
Tidewater AREC Research Farm, 1045 Hare Rd., Suffolk, VA 23437

Registration begins at 7:30 a.m.

WEST-SIDE TOUR STOPS
Soybean Harvest8:00 & 10:00 Integrated Disease Management for Peanut and Cotton – Dr. H. Mehl and Dr. Joseph Opoku
8:30 & 10:30 Monitoring and Thresholds for Managing Pests and Protecting Non-Target Species in Soybean & Cotton – Dr. A. Herbert
9:00 & 11:00 Potassium Fertility in Cotton – Dr. H. Frame
9:30 & 11:30 Potassium for Soybean – Ms. A. Stewart & Dr. D. Holshouser

 

EAST-SIDE TOUR STOPSTAREC PH Field Tour - Peanut
8:00 & 10:00 Sorghum OVT Fertility and Disease – Dr. J. Oakes and Mr. B. Acharya
8:30 & 10:30 Mid-Atlantic Double-Cropping Initiative – Dr. D. Holshouser
9:00 & 11:00 New Fungicide Decision Aid for Soybean – Dr. H. Mehl and Mr. Tian Zhou
9:30 & 11:30 PVQE Updates and UAV Peanut Drought Research – Dr. M. Balota and Dr. Joseph Oakes

JOINT WEST- AND EAST-TOUR PARTICIPANTS:
12:00 noon Nozzle Technology Dr. M. Flessner

CERTIFIED CROP ADVISERS – The field day has been approved for the following CEUs:
Nutrient Management: 1.5
Integrated Pest Management: 2
Crop Management: 1

Also during tour:
Industry & Educational exhibits
Updates from FSA and NRCS
Private and Commercial Pesticide recertifications

Immediately following the field tour, participants are invited to stay for lunch provided by The Filling Station of Robersonville, N.C. This year’s menu will include fish, shrimp, fried chicken and all the fixings.

Pre-registration is required for the tour/lunch.
Please contact Pam Worrell at 757-657-6450, ext. 401
or e-mail pamdw14@vt.edu by September 4th.