Category Archives: Commodity

Why is my late-planted 110 day RM maturing in 100 days (or less) this year?

Recent observations from around the state have found corn maturing at a fast pace this year, especially corn that was planted late.  The most commonly used method for assigning corn hybrid maturity ratings is based on Days to Maturity.  This typically indicates the number of days it would take a corn hybrid to reach physiological maturity or “black layer”.  But temperature drives corn development, not calendar days.  So the “thermal time” to maturity calculated using growing degree days (GDD) is a more accurate measure.  Especially when the growing season has been particularly warmer or cooler than normal.

The chart below shows the difference in cumulative GDD between 2016 and the 30 year mean temperatures beginning on JUNE 1.

GDD_16

 

 

We are 6, 7, and 10% above the “normal” GDD accumulation for August 31 at Suffolk, Richmond, and Orange, respectively.

This might explain why a 110 day RM corn is maturing more quickly than expected based on the “day” count.  The plant has actually accumulated heat units at a faster rate this year.

If May 1 is the starting point, we are 3, 4, and 7% above the “normal” GDD accumulation for these sites.  So this effect is likely to seem greater in later planted corn.

BMSB and kudzu bug in soybean: update for Aug. 25, 2016

This past week our scouts found four new Virginia counties with brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB) in soybean (Caroline, Shenandoah, Rockbridge, and Henry).  Thresholds for field edges where BMSB is the predominant stink bug species are 3-5 adults + medium and large nymphs per 2-minute visual count, or 3-5 in 15 sweeps.  The Shenandoah field (R5 growth stage) that was sampled was above threshold with 8 BMSB per 2-minute count; six counties were approaching threshold (please see the map for specifics).

BMSB_map_25_Aug_2016

Kudzu bugs were found in three new counties (Prince George [reported by ANR Agent Scott Reiter), James City, and Franklin).  No counties had threshold levels of kudzu bugs (threshold is one nymph per sweep, which equals 15 nymphs per 15 sweeps).

KB_map_25_Aug_2016

Corn earworm soybean update.

In both 2014 and 2015 we experienced very light corn earworm (CEW) infestations in our soybean crop. This summer we are back to a more normal situation with spotty light to moderate level infestations. Some fields have hit thresholds for sure, but not all. And, as is the case in most years, worms are in some fields that are only in the flowering stage—which has been proven many times over the years NOT to be a problem, that is, does NOT result in any yield loss. CEW do their damage when they feed on developing seed during the R5-R6 growth stages. If needed, a single application (if the right insecticide is used) during this stage should be all that is needed for season-long CEW control.

As always, in a year with spotty infestations, it pays to scout fields carefully to find those at threshold so they can be protected. We have recently proven that pyrethoid insecticides have a devastating effect on the thousands of beneficial insects and spiders in a soybean field. If left alone, they have then potential to control CEW infestations by eating the eggs and small worms and therefore prevent the need for an insecticide spray. So, be careful with pyrethroid applications and use them only if thresholds are met. You will very likely save money in the long run.

What are the thresholds for CEW in soybean? There is not a one-size-fits-all answer. This fact sheet Soybean_insect_mgmt_2016 has a CEW Calculator that can provide a good answer based on some of the factors that must be considered—like the estimated application cost and bushel value. Use this as a starting point.

What to treat with? We have been monitoring CEW for pyrethroid insecticide resistance for several years by collecting and testing adults (moths). This year is no exception. Individual moths are exposed to a pyrethroid and we document the percent that survive (=resistant). This year we are seeing high levels of survivorship averaging about 40% over all sample dates and locations.  This means that to achieve good CEW control, non-pyrethoids insecticides should be considered. For CEW, I would focus on those that ‘specialize’ in worm control (like Prevathon, Besiege, or Spinosad).  Lannate is another option but has essentially zero residual activity, whereas the others should provide several days of protection, depending on rainfall amounts and frequency. If stink bugs are also present in the field, the worm products will not be effective. A pyrethroid will need to be tank mixed with the worm product (example, Prevathon plus bifenthren)—or a product like Besiege can be used that contains both a worm product and a pyrethroid. Below is a list of insecticides labeled for use in soybean.

Soybean_insecticides_2016

Cotton insect pest update—bollworms are here.

At this point in the season, many cotton fields have been treated once for mid-season plant bug/stink bug. The next decision will be focused on bollworm control—whether it is needed, and if so, what insecticides to use. We are seeing a general increase in bollworm moth activity at TAREC and have gotten recent reports of some pretty large worm infestations in a couple of peanut fields in the cotton area, and outbreaks in a couple of soybean fields in the Suffolk area. Caution: if the earlier applied mid-season plant bug/stink bug spray included a pyrethroid (e.g., bifenthrin), the beneficial populations in those fields will have been depleted—which makes them more susceptible to bollworm.

We have plenty of data that shows that cotton varieties with bollworm protection traits can be damaged by worms. Some escape the toxin, survive, and feed on bolls. We have seen as much as 9% or more boll damage in some varieties which is 3 times our working threshold of 3% live worms/fresh boll damage.  But, that was in years when bollworm pressure was high.  In years like 2014 and 2015 when bollworm populations were very light, we saw essentially no boll damage in any of the varieties.  So what is the 2016 situation?  So far it looks like we may be looking at heavier pressure than last year, light to moderate depending on the field—but—we won’t know for sure for another few weeks—as the main flight out of field corn has not kicked in yet. The corn crop is generally a little behind and a little less mature than normal for this time of year because of later planting and good rainfall.

The best approach for managing bollworm in cotton is to scout fields for worms by inspecting small bolls, the terminals, and under flowers (boll tags) for live worms or damage. As mentioned, our current threshold is 3% of the fruit or positions inspected with either live worms or damage.

We have a history of bollworm resistance to pyrethroids in Virginia and this year is no exception. Of the 650 or so moths tested so far, we are seeing about 40+% survival. This is high. So for the best control results we suggest using a non-pyrethroid (e.g., Prevathon, Belt, Blackhawk, or Intrepid Edge). Note that Belt is not widely available this season due to the registration being canceled by EPA. Distributors and growers can use existing stocks according to label, but when that is gone, that will be it—at least as far as we know.

We also recommend adding a pyrethroid to the worm product to clean up any plant bugs/stink bugs that may be in the cotton. There are several pyrethroid options, and I would use the highest labelled rate for stink bugs—for better kill and longer residual. Besiege is the only product that contains both the non-pyrethroid (= Prevathon) with a pyrethroid (= Karate). With all the other non-pyrethroids, you will have to do the tank mixing on the farm. And, it is past time to include any of the insecticides in the neonicotinoid class as they do not provide good control of either bollworms or stink bugs.

BMSB and kudzu bug update for Aug. 9, 2016

Our soybean scouts found brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB) in soybean in nine more Virginia counties last week (Goochland, Fluvanna, Albemarle, Buckingham, Greene, Cumberland, Nelson, Bedford, and Franklin).  The Bedford soybean field was in the R4 growth stage, and was above threshold with 8 BMSB observed in a 2-minute visual count (the threshold is 3-5).  More scouting, management, and other information can be found in the publication, “Brown Marmorated Stink Bug Biology and Management in Mid-Atlantic Soybeans.”  Nelson county was just reaching threshold with 3 BMSB in a 2-minute visual count; all other “positive” counties had relatively low numbers of BMSB reported.  Here is the map for the season:

BMSB_map_8_Aug_2016

Kudzu bugs were detected in nine new Virginia counties last week (Fluvanna, Albemarle, Cumberland, Powhatan, Nottoway, Louisa, Greene, Amherst, and Henry).  None of them were near the threshold of 1 kudzu bug nymph per sweep.  The kudzu bug map:

KB_map_8_Aug_2016We will continue to provide updates on these insect pests of soybean throughout the season.

Zeal soybean label for spider mites

The following information was provided by John Cranmer at Valent U.S.A. Corporation:

“The EPA has approved Zeal for use in soybeans to control spider mites.  The unique  translaminar movement of Zeal SC reaches mites where they hide and feed, on the underside of the soybean leaves. Formulated as a liquid soluble concentrate, Zeal SC is friendly for the aerial applicator, with easy mixing and a low use rate to treat more acres per load.  Soybeans are the latest new crop registration for Zeal SC, following recent expansions into field corn, cotton and melons.”

The states have been notified; watch for approvals for the Zeal soybean label from your state(s) to come in.  The supplemental label is attached here: 59639-202_Zeal SC_2016-ZSC-0010.soybean.XNY

Sugarcane aphid sorghum update

Brent Bean, Director of Agronomy, United Sorghum Checkoff Program, forwarded the following information on sugarcane aphid (SCA):

As many of you know, the sugarcane aphid has moved north faster than last year.  We now have confirmed reports of SCA in three southern counties of Kansas.  In addition, SCA is present as far north as Kentucky and Virginia.  In these northern sites SCA populations for the most part are low but have approached threshold levels in Virginia.  It is likely that at least low populations will be discovered in many counties within the Sorghum Belt in the coming weeks.

It is important to note that just because a few SCA are present in a field does not mean an insecticide application is or will be justified.  Those who planted hybrids with some tolerance to SCA can expect the populations to build more slowly.  In addition, beneficials in many areas are reported to be in high numbers, this will also help keep SCA populations in check.  Although SCA was present in South Texas this year, only a portion of the fields reached threshold levels.

Something we have clearly learned the last two years is that once SCA is present in an area, scouting of fields becomes critical.  Scouting should occur at least once a week once SCA has been discovered in a region, and in fields where SCA has already been detected, scouting should take place at least twice a week.  Insecticide application should begin as soon as the SCA population is at threshold levels.  Research has shown yields can be drastically reduced if insecticide application is delayed for several days once threshold levels are reached.  States and regions vary slightly in their recommended threshold levels, but in general, an insecticide application is justified when 50 aphids per leaf are present on 25 percent of the plants. Consult your state or regional extension service for specific threshold information.  We are entering a critical time in the Sorghum Belt, and SCA can potentially reach threshold levels very quickly.  Diligence in scouting is an absolute must!

There are two products that should be considered if an insecticide application is warranted.  These are Sivanto prime from Bayer, and Transform WG from Dow AgroSciences.  Both are effective, but good coverage is critical.  Most entomologists recommend 4 – 5 ounces of Sivanto Prime and 1 – 1.5 ounces of Transform WG.  The lower rates are usually recommended to control SCA at or close to threshold levels.  If SCA populations are way above threshold levels, then the higher rates may be justified.

If other insects such as midge or headworms are present with SCA, avoid using pyrethroids for their control.  Pyrethroids can lower beneficial populations significantly and cause a rapid increase in SCA populations.  In the South Plains region of Texas the ‘yellow’ sugarcane aphid is showing up in a few fields, often in the same fields with sugarcane aphid.  Care should be taken in distinguishing between these two aphids.

Although sweet sorghum is a minor U.S. crop, sugarcane aphids can greatly impact yield.  Sivanto prime has received a section 18 Crisis Exemption label in Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee and North Carolina for use on sweet sorghum in 2016.

NOTE from Ames Herbert, VT: Note that the ‘yellow’ sugar cane aphid mentioned above is a different species than SCA. Yellow sugarcane aphids are covered with small hairs and the two cornicles (pair of small upright backward-pointing tubes found on the top side of the last segment of the bodies) are small and pale (see attached image).  The SCA is also called ‘white’ sugarcane aphid. It does not have hairs on the body and the two cornicles are dark (see attached image).  Yellow sugarcane aphid is a known pest in Virginia of forage grasses like orchardgrass. Like Texas, we are also finding yellow sugar cane aphid mixed with SCA, and in a few fields also mixed with corn leaf aphid, another known pest of corn and sorghum. Corn leaf aphid is easy to distinguish from the other sorghum aphid species as they have a dark head and legs, a dark green body color, and dark cornicles (see attached image).

This sorghum aphid problem is new for us so we are having to make some ‘educated guesses’ about what constitutes a threat, and what the best control options might be. For now, we suggest that SCA numbers should guide control decisions, that is, abide by SCA thresholds—and stick with the products that are recommended for SCA. Avoid the use of pyrethroids since they will not be effective against SCA, and could flare secondary pests by disrupting natural enemy populations.  Natural enemies including tiny aphid parasitic wasps and a variety of lady beetles can be very effective in helping reduce aphid and other pest populations, so we need to conserve them whenever possible.

white sugarcane aphid yellow sugarcane aphid grantham osu corn leaf aphid

Nodulation deficiency in peanut

Indeed, 2016 was not a good year for effective nodulation and early peanut root growth in the Virginia and Carolina region. The growing season started relatively cool and wet. Under this condition peanut developed only a few roots with a reduced number of nodules. These plants were smaller and less green than “normal” plants in particular when planted in crop residue because this maintained soil cooler and wetter. Figure 1 is an example and shows three peanut plants planted on May 9 and picture was taken on June 25. Two plants at the left are smaller, yellower, and with less root growth and number of nodules. These were planted in sorghum residue. The plant at the right is bigger, greener, and has more roots and nodules, but was planted in cultivated and sandier land.

Smaller and yellower two plants at the left are due to poorer nodulation than for plant at the right, even though planted at the same time.

Smaller and yellower two plants at the left are due to poorer nodulation than for plant at the right, even though planted at the same time.

What can be done to prevent poor nodulation, then? One very important thing is to inoculate at planting. But even then, in cool and wet soil roots grow slow for fast inoculation and Bradyrhizobium bacteria may die in absence of oxygen if the soil is too wet. Ammonium sulfate can be used up to 150 pounds of nitrogen per acre, which is about 714 pounds of ammonium sulfate per acre. Usually at beginning flowering poor nodulation will show up in yellow and smaller plants, and right then inorganic nitrogen needs to be applied. The sooner, the better.

It is, therefore, important to scout not just for disease and insects but also for the number and size of the nodules in the first 45 days after planting. To establish a threshold of nodules a farmer should look for during this time, my program has found that after two weeks after planting an average number of 5 big nodules on the main root is to be expected; at 30 days, 70 nodules of any size on the main and lateral roots; and about 130 at 45 days after planting.