Category Archives: Commodity

Brown marmorated stink bug (BMSB) update for soybean

Please click “”More”” to view the most recent update on BMSB distribution in Virginia soybean (please see slide 1 of the attached pdf document). On August 20, our soybean scout Ed Seymore reported that in the last week stink bugs have started to move out of corn and into soybean fields in the counties of Culpeper, Fauquier, Franklin, King George, Rappahannock, Rockingham, Spotsylvania and Stafford. These counties have reached the threshold for stink bugs of 5 stink bugs in 15 sweeps (in the fields that we scouted). Attention should be paid to fields that border corn and woods especially with the tree of heaven (end report from Mr. Seymore). Note that thresholds in soybean do not distinguish between BMSB and native green and brown stink bug species (also shown on slide 1). Dr. Herbert’’s insecticide efficacy trials and on-farm edge treatment research suggest that most insecticides provide initial stink bug knock down (please refer to slides 2 and 3 for efficacy trial results, where the higher percent control, the better). Residual activity varies, and reinvasion can occur after loss of residual protection. Since BMSB exhibit a strong soybean field edge preference, perimeter-only treatments may be effective. Please remember to always base management decisions on proper scouting and thresholds, and always read and follow the pesticide label (sometimes, products and/or rates that we include in our tests are experimental; also, product labels and rates may change from year to year). Additional information: bmsb-pdf

Soybean aphids spotted in Essex County Virginia: Refresher on Thresholds and Sampling

I just got a report of a soybean aphid infestation in Essex County. It has been several years since we have seen soybean aphid in Virginia, but the summer conditions (generally cooler, overcast) favor development of that pest. Reports of spotty infestations are also coming in from other states, North Carolina included.

As a reminder, the current economic threshold for aphids is an average of 250 aphids per plant, on two consecutive field visits spaced about 5-7 days apart (hit the ‘more’ button for more). This is because aphid populations can ‘crash’ quickly due to heavy pressure by natural enemies like lady beetles, parasitic wasps, and fungal diseases. When scouting, choose a ‘Z’ or ‘W’ shaped pattern to cover the entire field and sample at last 20 to 30 plants per field by examining the entire plant including stems and upper and lower leaf surfaces. Use the aphid/plant average for determining the need for treatment. The threshold applies to soybean through the R5 growth stage (3 mm long seed in the pod at one of the four uppermost nodes on the main stem), after which time plants can tolerate 1,000+ aphids with no threat to yield.
Additional information: soybean-aphid-threshold-ppt

Corn earworm activity is increasing, and, an update on the pyrethroid resistance monitoring results

CEW moth activity is definitely beginning to increase. We are now catching 20-30 per night in our traps compared to 4 or 5 per night last week. We are not sure how this will progress. A lot will depend on the weather, and eventually, corn harvest. We will keep posting updates.
PEANUTS: We are beginning to find just a few worms in peanut fields—way below any reasonable threshold (See the advisory I posted on the peanut/worm situation for more details).
SORGHUM: A few worms are beginning to show up in sorghum heads (See the advisory I posted on sorghum head worms).
SOYBEAN: We are getting reports of a few worms in soybean fields but not at threshold levels, and not threatening the seed.
COTTON: Although we have found a few CEW eggs, we are finding almost no worms. This could be year when the BG2 and WideStrike provide enough protection, without additional foliar sprays.
PYRETHROID RESISTANCE: Keep in mind that I use the term ‘resistance’ loosely. We cannot prove/disprove actual resistance using the AVT (Adult Vial Testing) method, only determine the percent that survive the pyrethroid challenge. So, where do we stand this year? If you open the file (‘more’ button) you can get a quick comparison of where we are compared to last year—so far we are seeing only about 30% survivorship. But also notice that the number of moths tested to date is very low, which could bias our results. Is 30% survivorship enough to warrant a shift to a non-pyrethroid—my answer is, it depends. My rule of thumb is—if a field is at or just above the threshold (check that for each crop), a pyrethroid applied at the highest labeled rate, using a spray system that achieves good plant coverage, will do well. But, if a field is 3 to 4 times the threshold, or higher, a non-pyrethroid will be needed.
Additional information: cew-avt-results-aug-13-pptx

The sorghum head worm situation

As of this week, we are starting to find a few corn earworms in sorghum grain heads. We suggest that you should begin sampling any sorghum fields that have heads entering the milk stage—and many in Virginia are in that stage. Using the ‘bucket/shake’ method is the best way to determine the average number of worms per head. We recommend doing a series of 10-head samples in each field. Shake 10 randomly selected heads into a white 5-gallon bucket and count the worms/10=average per head. Do several 10-head samples in each field taking samples from areas with any obvious differences (different head maturities, areas next to corn, etc.)—then calculate an overall worm/head field average. Recommendations are pretty variable across states, but an average of 2 worms per head, or more, should trigger a spray. Use a spray boom/nozzle/gpa/psi system that delivers as much product to the heads as possible. Spraying leaves is a waste of product—the more product hitting the heads, the better. Directing sprays to the heads is even more important in varieties with compact heads (vs loose heads). When heads are compact, worms tend to burrow to the center, are not easily seen, and are not as vulnerable to sprays. Remember, the insecticides used for worm control depend on direct contact.

What insecticides should you use? Sorghum has fewer labeled insecticides than many commodities, but there is a pretty good selection with different modes-of-action. Pyrethroids include Tombstone, Mustang Maxx, Karate/Warrior, and Asana XL, and others. Non-pyrethroids include Belt, Blackhawk (was Tracer), and Lannate. There are a few others that combine active ingredients like Stallion (Mustang + Lorsban) and Consero (Prolex + Tracer). Note that we have not evaluated these products so cannot make comments about control, but have experienced lack of control with pyrethroids, alone, when worm populations were high or worms were a large size (harder to kill) when sprays were applied.

Worms reported in SC and NC peanut fields, what doest that mean for VA growers?

I have seen reports of mixed species worm populations in some peanut fields in both South and North Carolina. Populations include corn earworm (may be some tobacco budworm also, but you cannot tell these species apart without some experience and good magnification of the mandibles/jaws), beet armyworm, and fall armyworm. Although I have not heard of worms in Virginia peanut fields, we should be on the lookout for them.

With these mixed species worm complexes it will be pretty important to know which species are in your fields—so—how good are your worm ID skills? We have a good insect ID guide available that shows the characteristics that most easily distinguish these different worm species. We will be glad to mail some to you, let us know, or you can access the guide on the web at: http://pubs.ext.vt.edu/444/444-360/444-360.html. Knowing the species is important in choosing the right insecticide—if control is needed (see below).

The next important question is—should I treat for worms? In my experience, many growers treat fields that are not at any risk to yield loss—that is, they ‘jump the gun’. It takes a lot of leaf feeding for worms to do economic damage to peanuts, and I have seen only a handful of cases where this has occurred over the past many years. This will be especially true this year when peanut canopies are very large, so are able to withstand even more leaf ‘tattering’ with no negative consequence. But if you do determine that a field is in danger, feel the urge to spray, or just love killing worms—better not rely on a pyrethroid or you may not be satisfied with the results. Corn earworms have become a little more difficult to control with pyrethroids in recent years, and beet armyworm and fall armyworm have never been very susceptible to pyrethroids. You will need to turn to some of the non-pyrethroid options like Steward EC @9.2-11.3 oz/acres, Belt SC @2-4 oz/acre, or Blackhawk (was Tracer) @1.7-3.3 oz/acre.

Invitation to the Virginia Soybean Field Day – Aug. 14, 2013

You are invited to attend the 2013 Virginia Soybean Field Day at the Eastern Virginia Agricultural Research & Extension Center (EVAREC) in Warsaw on Wednesday August 14. Registration begins at 2:30 pm with field tours following at 3:00 pm. Dinner will be served at 6:00 pm courtesy of the Virginia Soybean Board and The Virginia Soybean Association. The address of the EVAREC is 2229 Menokin Road, Warsaw, VA 22572. If you are a person with a disability and desire any assistive devices, services or other accommodations to participate in this activity, please contact the Eastern Virginia Agricultural Research and Extension Center main office at 804-333-3485 (TDD number is 800-828-1120) prior to the event. Field day topics are shown below. We look forward to seeing you there.

Low Phytate Soybeans for a Healthier Chesapeake Bay (Dr. Bo Zhang, Virginia Tech Soybean Breeder); Elite STS Soybeans – Low Input, High Profit (Dr. Zhang);
Superior Conventional Soybeans for Better Yields (Dr. Zhang); Distribution and Management of Brown Marmorated Stink Bug and Kudzu Bug (Dr. Ames Herbert, Virginia Tech Entomologist); Maximizing Double-Crop Yields Through Inputs (Dr. David Holshouser, Virginia Tech Soybean Agronomist); Optimizing Early Season Growth & Yield (Mr. Kevin Dillon, Graduate Research Assistant and United Soybean Board Fellow); Does Variety Affect Yield Response to Fungicides? (Mr. Dillon); Predicting Yield Increases with Fungicides (Dr. Pat Phipps, Virginia Tech Plant Pathologist); Small Grains 2013 Comments (Dr. Wade Thomason, Virginia Tech Small Grains Agronomist); Looking Ahead to Fall Planting (Mr. Keith Balderson, Essex County Extension Agent); Greetings from the Virginia Soybean Association (Mr. Logan Vaughan, President, VSA); CSES Department Update (Dr. Tom Thompson, CSES Department Head); Greetings from CALS (Dr. Jody Jellison, Assoc. Director, Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station).

Black light trap captures for week ending August 8, 2013

Please click “More” to view the tables with the average number of corn earworm moths and brown marmorated stink bugs (BMSB) captured per night in local black light traps. Mark Kraemer in Petersburg reported approximately 3 to 4 BMSB per foot on some maturity group 4 vegetable-type soybean with pods present (Guelph and Kanrich), but BMSB were not on surrounding maturity group 5 soybean in the flowering stage. Dr. Kraemer also reported seeing BMSB on Asian long beans again this year. Mike Arrington found corn earworm (=bollworm) egg-threshold levels in cotton research plots at the Tidewater AREC (Suffolk) and at an on-farm cotton research trial in Southampton County this week. Thanks to our black light trap operators for their reports this week: David Moore, Kelvin Wells, Laura Maxey, Mary Beahm, Chris Drake, Watson Lawrence, Mark Kraemer, Janet Spencer, Ames Herbert and his entomology crew, Scott Reiter, Keith Balderson, Helene Doughty, and Jim Jenrette. Additional information: blt-8-aug-2013-pdf