Category Archives: Commodity

The Best Sorghum Hybrids for VA and the Mid-Atlantic

Not long ago, it was estimated that the break even yield for grain sorghum grown in the Mid-Atlantic is 85 bu/ac at the current seed price. Based on OVT testing in SC, NC, VA, and MD in 2013 and 2014 it seems that a good hybrid selection exists for growing sorghum as a single crop per season but not for planting after wheat as a double crop. For example 13 hybrids in VA and 19 across the four states produced average yields from 94 to 128 bu/ac in 2014. [2014 Sorghum OVT Summary] From these, five hybrids (DEKALB DKS 51-01 and 44-20; Pioneer 83P17; Mycogen 1G855; and Sorghum Partners NK6638) were also top performers across the Virginia-Carolina region in 2013 with yields at or over 100 bu/ac. At such high yield potential, they can produce 85 bu/ac and over in a regular farm setting. But double crop sorghum produced at the most 80 bu/ac (DKS51-01) across the Mid-Atlantic and 75 bu/ac (ALTA AG2103) in VA in 2014. Double crop grain sorghums did not perform better in 2013 either, when averaged across the region. There were a few exceptions; in NC certain hybrids (DKS33-88, 51-01, 44-20, and 55-33; ALTA AG2115 and 2101, Richardson Seed 92123; Southern Harvest 5964, 8064; and Southern States SS540) performed well under double cropping production. But, is this sufficient to conclude otherwise when neither in VA, MD, nor SC yields of double cropped sorghum exceeded 80 bu/ac? Better hybrids with improved adaptability to the region and this type of cropping would seem to be needed for grain sorghum to have a place in this region and where double cropping is practiced over hundreds of thousands of acres. We will continue to search for better hybrids in a double crop system within the OVT trials in 2015 and, hopefully, beyond.

Drs. Ron Heiniger, Bob Kratochvil, and Chris Ray and their teams are gratefully acknowledged for providing the OVT data from NC, MD, and SC, respectively.

Summary of 2014 Peanut Variety and Quality Evaluation Results

Created in 1968, the Peanut Variety and Quality Evaluation (PVQE) program is a multi-state data support program for the Virginia-type cultivar development. Led by the TAREC researchers and staff, the PVQE is a NIFA multi-state joint effort with major universities in NC and SC. Among current priorities, development of Virginia-type cultivars with the high oleic fatty acid trait was identified as the most important for the VC region. The 2014 results from tests in VA, NC, and SC are here: AREC-125-pdf

The 2015 VA Peanut Production Guide is also available at http://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/AREC/AREC-117/AREC-117.html.

 

Boxwood Blight on Boxwood Holiday Greenery

Boxwood blight has been present in Virginia since 2011 and has since spread from its original location in Carroll County to a number of other counties around the state by movement of infected plants. Because much of Virginia’s greenery production industry is located in areas where boxwood blight is known to occur, the potential for spread of the disease on boxwood greenery also exists. Last year we notified agents regarding the potential for spread of the disease via holiday boxwood greenery. Now that potential has become a reality in North Carolina. The North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services recently discovered boxwood blight in holiday boxwood greenery sold at several retail locations in North Carolina. Although the fungus that causes boxwood blight is not active at cold temperatures, it produces structures that can survive on plant debris over the winter. The fungus could potentially infect nearby susceptible plants in the landscape when favorable weather conditions return. Therefore, it is very important that boxwood greenery be properly disposed after the holidays by double-bagging and removing to the landfill. Do not compost boxwood greenery and do not leave it in cull piles in the landscape. Inspect boxwood greenery carefully for symptoms of boxwood blight before introducing it to a site containing susceptible boxwood plants and discard symptomatic greenery as described above. Symptoms of boxwood blight include brown leaf spots with dark border, black streaks on green stems, and leaf drop. Be aware, however, that even asymptomatic greenery could potentially harbor the pathogen. If clientele have highly valued boxwood in their landscape, they may want to avoid introducing boxwood greenery altogether.

For more information on the North Carolina situation, refer to the NCSU Plant Disease and Insect Clinic blog at: http://ncsupdicblog.blogspot.com/2014/12/pest-alert-boxwood-blight-on-holiday.html.

For more information on boxwood blight in general, including Best Management Practices for the greenery industry, landscapers, home growers, and retail and wholesale nurseries, visit the Virginia Boxwood Blight Task Force web site at:http://www.ext.vt.edu/topics/agriculture/commercial-horticulture/boxwood-blight/index.html.

Please make sure that property managers of historic sites in your area are informed about this update.

Leaf spots on boxwood caused by the boxwood blight pathogen (photo by A. Bordas)

Leaf spots on boxwood caused by the boxwood blight pathogen (photo by A. Bordas)

Black streaking on boxwood stems caused by the boxwood blight (photo by A. Bordas)

Black streaking on boxwood stems caused by the boxwood blight pathogen (photo by A. Bordas)

 

Field corn insecticide seed treatment chart

There are many insecticide seed treatment combinations available on commercial field corn seed. Although there are only 4 main active insecticide ingredients involved (imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, clothianidin, and chlorantraniliprole), there are currently at least 20 different trade names with different combinations and amounts of active ingredient per seed.  The chart provided here (see below) was created as a collaborative effort by corn entomologists from across the southeast.  It shows the combination and rate of the active ingredients of each product and the relative efficacy against the most common soil pests.  Because of the diversity of soil pests of corn in Virginia—depending on location, soil type, crop rotation system and history of pests—product selection should be made to fit each situation.  This chart can be used to select the most effective product for the most common pests of a particular field. For example, if seed corn maggot has been a chronic pest, at least 8 products are ranked as Excellent (E rating on the chart) for controlling that pest—compared with only two products that provide Excellent control of wireworm.  Hopefully this chart will be helpful when selecting the best insecticide seed treatments for next year’s field corn crop.

Field corn insecticide seed treatment chart

Field corn variety insecticide trait and herbicide tolerance chart

Field corn varieties provide a dizzying array of insect toxins—at least 14 different combinations by my count—that have very different degrees of efficacy against several corn pests.  The chart provided here (see below) lists the current commercial varieties, the insect toxin combination they provide, and the relative efficacy of each against the most commonly encountered corn insect pests.  The chart was created as a collaborative effort by corn entomologists from across the southeast, with guidance by two in particular, Kathy Flanders at Auburn University and Dave Buntin at University of Georgia.  For our purposes in Virginia, I would pay the most attention to those  varieties that provide Excellent (E rating on the chart) protection against corn earworm and fall armyworm, and if you are growing continuous corn, especially in the valley and piedmont regions, corn rootworm.  The chart also provides the herbicide tolerance package of each variety, and the associated refuge requirement. Hopefully this chart will help you with your choice of seed in the next season.

Field corn insecticide trait and herbicide tolerance chart

 

 

2014 Virginia Soybean Yield Contest

The Virginia Soybean Association in cooperation with Virginia Cooperative Extension would like to announce the 2014 Virginia Soybean Yield Contest. The purpose of the Virginia Soybean Yield Contest is to emphasize and demonstrate the practices necessary to produce maximum economic yields, to recognize those producers who grow high-yielding soybeans, and to gather data on the practices utilized by these outstanding producers. With the help of various seed companies, we reward and promote the achievements of Virginia’s most productive soybean farmers.

There are four Soybean Yield Contest categories: 1) Full-Season, Non-irrigated; 2) Double-Crop, Non-irrigated; and 3) Irrigated (Full-Season or Double-Crop; and 4) Most Efficient Yield (MEY). First, second, and third place winners of the full-season, double-crop, and irrigated contest will be recognized with appropriate trophies or plaques. In addition, cash awards of $200, $100, and $50 will be presented to the first, second, and third place winners in each of these categories. The winner of the MEY contest will receive a plaque declaring him or her the most efficient soybean producer in Virginia for that year.

Printable entry forms and contest details can be obtained from your County Agent or on my website:  (http://www.arec.vaes.vt.edu/tidewater/soybean/).  I look forward to seeing your entries.

Checking on Peanut Maturity in Virginia

In only two weeks since my last peanut maturity advisory, peanut changed from this

'Bailey' peanut planted on May 5th, and dug on Sep 2nd.

‘Bailey’ peanut planted on May 5th, and dug on September 2nd.

to this

'Bailey' planted on May 6th and dug on September 17th.

‘Bailey’ planted on May 6th and dug on September 17th.

Based on the new picture taken on 9/17/14, it seems that 10 to 14 more days will be sufficient for early May planted peanut to reach maturity in Virginia. This seems to be in agreement with the heat units accumulated from May 1st, 2531 to 2672 °F, in southeastern VA and the number of days from planting (150 days) estimated to suffice for maturity of Bailey and Sugg.

However, peanut planted as late as May 15th seems to have reached similar maturity with the ones planted in the first week of May with far less heat units and days from planting. We conducted this morning a pod blasting in Southampton County, VA, for 27 fields planted from May 4th to May 15th. With the exception of three slower maturing fields, two of which from west Northampton County, NC, all other peanuts seemed to be ready to dig in 7 to 14 days from now. A few fields were ready to dig in the next few days, and actually the farmers growing these fields already started digging a couple days ago. A similar situation was reported by Extension Agent Janet Spencer who conducted a pod blasting in the Isle of Weight County, VA, on 9/17/14.

Have the new peanut cultivars reduced temperature requirements? Or the heat units we have had this year were “good” heat units including a higher frequency of “just right” peanut temperatures and “just right” precipitation amounts and distribution? Or maybe both? Regardless, digging decision is one of the most important decisions in peanut production and basing it on the pod mesocarp color, just like we are showing here, I highly recommend. Tomorrow, Sept 19, another pod blasting clinique will start at 9:00 AM at the Johnson Brothers buying station in Surry, VA. If interested, contact Extension Agent Glenn Slade, 757-294-5215.

Sudden Death Syndrome and Brown Stem Rot Showing Up in Virginia Soybeans (David Holshouser & Hillary Mehl)

Many fields are exhibiting symptoms of interveinal chlorosis and necrosis. In the some areas (hot spots), leaves are burning up and dying. In the worse fields, entire plants are dying. Sometimes the leaves are falling off the petiole; in other cases, the leaves remain attached. The symptoms look similar to, but usually worse than, various nutrient deficiencies. Actually, what is occurring is very similar to a nutrient deficiency in that something is restricting the roots and/or vascular system from moving water and nutrients through the plants.  If you start seeing such symptoms, dig some roots and examine them. Then, split the stem and tap root. If you see any discoloring, then you likely have a stem/root disease.

Is this sudden death syndrome (SDS)? Maybe. We tend to hear a lot about this disease in the media, in a seed catalog ratings, and throughout many extension bulletins in the Midwest. Although the name makes the disease sound like the entire field is getting ready to die, this is not usually the case. Up until this year, SDS was neither devastating nor widespread in Virginia. However, we are seeing more than the usual cases this year.

SDS in Virginia Soybean

SDS in Virginia Soybean

It appears that the disease spreads suddenly; you don’t see it one week, but the parts of the field begin dying the next. In reality, it has been building up slowly as the season progresses. The infection actually took place much earlier in the year. Regardless, SDS will rarely result in widespread death of the soybean crop. Instead, you will usually see it in spots and patches in the field. Worth noting is that SDS is commonly associated with soybean cyst nematode infestations. So, if your field has been diagnosed with SDS, then you may want to sample for nematodes. Below is a photo of one of our on-farm soybean variety tests. It is one of the worst cases of SDS that I have ever seen. Although a few varieties are more tolerant to the disease than others, it appeared to affect all of the varieties to some extent.

SDS in On-Farm Variety Test in Virginia

SDS in On-Farm Variety Test in Virginia

Although SDS is turning up in several fields this year, the same above-ground symptoms are also association with brown stem rot (BSR), which has been the most common root/stem disease in Virginia. Some of the plant samples that have come through our plant pathology lab have been diagnosed as BSR. It usually doesn’t cause widespread death and it usually limited to small spots or patches in the field. In general, it will not continue to spread over the rest of the field; however, the patches will enlarge over time. Yield loss is usually minimum and restricted to the infected areas.

SDS Symptoms in Soybean Stem

SDS Symptoms in Soybean Stem

As mentioned earlier, if plants begin suddenly showing above-ground symptoms, dig the roots and split some stems.  If the pith (center) of the stem and taproot right at the soil level is brown, then the cause is likely (but not always) BSR. If you see a white pith and the rest of the root is brown, then the disease could be SDS. Another diagnostic tool is to look at the leaves. If the leaflets fall off but leave the petiole attached to the stem, it is likely SDS. if the leaves don’t fall, it’s likely BSR. Finally, you’ll seed more rotted roots with SDS. But, to find the rotted roots, you’ll need to dig them up and wash the soil from the roots. Jerking the plant out of the ground will likely strip off most of the roots.

The last disease that could be a problem and exhibit the same symptoms is red crown rot (in peanut, this is called cylindrocladium black rot or CBR). This disease can however be recognized by red fruiting bodies found at the base of the stem. Red crown rot was more common when Virginia’s peanut acreage was greater and soybean and peanut were being rotated with each other.

Red Crown Rot in Soybean

Red Crown Rot in Soybean

Regardless of the disease, what can you do about it? Unfortunately, there is nothing that can be done this year. Foliar fungicides will not control a disease that is inside the stem and roots. But, in the future, rotate out of soybean for one or more years. Also, you may want to select a variety with resistance to that disease when you plant soybean in the field. Finally, as mentioned earlier, take a nematode sample. Just because you’re seeing SDS or BSR in your field this year doesn’t mean that you have nematodes. But anything that is restricting root growth could aggravate SDS or BSR; therefore the symptoms would be more evident in fields infested with nematodes.

SOYBEAN LOOPER ALERT

Soybeans in parts of North Carolina, especially in their eastern ‘Blacklands’, have been plagued by soybean looper infestations for a few weeks.  I got the first report of infestations on our Eastern Shore earlier this week, and today, I got a report of a field hit in Southampton County.

Soybean loopers follow a pattern that we have seen in the past.  They do not overwinter in Virginia so moths must migrate in from the south. Adult moths are transported short or long distances by weather fronts.  It is not uncommon to find a few soybean loopers in any given field, any time during the season.  But it is fairly uncommon to have large flights.  The pattern that I have seen, and the one that is playing out this year is that when large populations build up to our south, moths are transported to our area in large numbers—and—most commonly in mid-September.

Another important factor to be aware of is that almost invariably, these large flights result in large worm outbreaks IN FIELDS THAT HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY TREATED WITH PYRETHROIDS.  Our current research is showing that pyrethroids are hard on beneficial insects and spiders that feed on looper eggs and small worms.  If destroyed, a much larger percentage of looper eggs hatch and a larger percentage of worms survive.

So, if a looper infestation is discovered in a field, what is the threshold and what products provide the best control.  We do not have a threshold for loopers but lump them into a general leaf defoliators ‘guild’ which can include many leaf eaters (Japanese beetles, green cloverworms, grasshoppers, bean leaf beetles and others)—and base a treatment decision on the total leaf area destroyed by the guild. We recommend not treating fields with fully developed seed unless 35-40% of the leaf area is eaten and bugs are still present.

We also know that soybean looper is a unique pest in that large numbers can completely defoliate a field in a short period of time, in as few as 5-7 days if numbers are really high.  So here is a looper rule-of-thumb.  Treat if you get 12-15 or more in 15 sweeps and the field has not reached full pod maturity (pods yellowing and seed getting hard).

Do not use a pyrethroid for loopers.  These critters are hard to kill and the best success will be with non-pyrethroids like Belt at 3 oz, Prevathon at 14 oz, or Besiege at 10 oz.  Other products that contain sinosad may also be effective.

Defoliation by soybean loopers