Soybean Rust Update: October 7, 2013

Hillary L. Mehl, Extension Plant Pathologist, Virginia Tech Tidewater AREC, Suffolk VA

Last week, soybean rust (SBR) was confirmed in several more counties in Virginia bringing the total to eight (Suffolk, Chesapeake, Virginia Beach, Isle of Wight, Hanover, Prince George, Brunswick, and Sussex). The level of infection on soybean leaflets was low, and though we have confirmed the fungus is present throughout the region, we are not seeing much disease development. sbr_13811517352621This is probably due to dry weather conditions, and fortunately, this has allowed for most of the soybean crop to reach R6 and escape the threat of yield losses from SBR. The fact that the fungus has spread but caused little disease is a good illustration of how important environmental conditions are to the development (or lack of development) of disease epidemics. Even if the weather conditions do become more conducive, there is not enough time left in the season for SBR to reach high enough levels to impact yield. The SBR fungus arrived relatively early in Virginia this year, but it is unlikely to impact the soybean crop in the state.


The standard recommendation for control of SBR once it is confirmed within 100 miles of a crop is to spray soybeans that have not yet reached the R6 stage with triazole or pre-mix fungicides. However, an important caveat to the rule this late in the season is that the crop should also have good yield potential. Otherwise, there may be little or no economic benefit to fungicide sprays. Both Dr. Holshouser and Dr. Rideout concur that the threat of SBR to Virginia soybeans has likely passed.


As always, feel free to contact me if you have any specific questions or concerns.

 Hillary L. Mehl, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor of Plant Pathology
Virginia Tech Tidewater AREC
6321 Holland Road
Suffolk, VA   23437
Telephone: (757) 657-6450, ext. 423
Cell: (530) 906-0807


One thought on “Soybean Rust Update: October 7, 2013

  1. David Holshouser Post author

    Some have asked why our announcement of soybean rust being discovered comes 6 to 10 days after it is found. The answer lies in the protocol that we use to detect the fungus.

    First, the leaves are collected by agents or other cooperators and then overnight mailed to us at the Tidewater AREC. On the day that they arrive (day 2), we place the leaflets (usually 40-50 leaflets) in an incubator chamber (basically a plastic box with paper towels wet with distilled water) for 4 to 6 days. This will stimulate sporulation. After 4-6 days, every square inch of the leaflet is examined for pustules or soybean rust spores. We may also confirm that the infected area with an ELISA test. The announcement is made on the day we confirm that rust is present on the examined leaflets. Therefore, the discovery process could take 5 to 10 days.
    Although this may seem like a long delay in announcing our discovery, the above process actually allows us to discover the disease at extremely low levels. In most cases, if we were to look at the leaflets on the day they were sampled or on the day that they arrive at the TAREC, we would not find any signs or symptoms of the disease. In other words, there may be spores on the leaflets or the spores may have infected the leaflet, but the disease has yet to manifest itself. Therefore, the incubation process is necessary to determine if rust was present on the day of sampling.
    More importantly, when discovered at these low levels (even if it’s a week after sampling), it gives us 2-3 weeks to react and made appropriate fungicide applications.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *